UBVSX vs. HWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX).
UBVSX is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Apr 30, 2013. HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000.
Performance
UBVSX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UBVSX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBVSX JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I | 2.90% | 1.70% | 13.03% | 14.59% | -1.26% | 34.05% | 3.35% | 23.11% | -15.37% | 13.26% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 9.00% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBVSX achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 9.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UBVSX having a 9.72% annualized return and HWSAX not far ahead at 9.96%.
UBVSX
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
HWSAX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UBVSX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBVSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UBVSX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
UBVSX
HWSAX
UBVSX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBVSX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.78 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 1.22 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 1.17 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 4.34 | -2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBVSX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.78 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.42 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.47 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between UBVSX and HWSAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UBVSX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
UBVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%, more than HWSAX's 0.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBVSX JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I | 9.09% | 9.35% | 7.36% | 8.30% | 8.89% | 3.34% | 0.90% | 4.85% | 11.46% | 4.53% | 3.11% | 3.69% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.64% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Drawdowns
UBVSX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBVSX drawdown since its inception was -52.19%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBVSX and HWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBVSX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.19% | -72.14% | +19.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.53% | -16.44% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | -26.98% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.19% | -53.82% | +1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.27% | -1.09% | -5.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -11.03% | +4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.48% | 4.43% | +0.05% |
Volatility
UBVSX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 4.45%. This indicates that UBVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UBVSX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 4.45% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 12.99% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 23.99% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 21.71% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 24.65% | -0.05% |