PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBUD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBUD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBUD.DE achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than 4GLD.DE's 2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, UBUD.DE has outperformed 4GLD.DE with an annualized return of 14.59%, while 4GLD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.36% annualized return.


UBUD.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
0.94%
1Y
47.84%
3Y*
42.44%
5Y*
24.10%
10Y*
14.59%

4GLD.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
2.80%
6M
6.42%
1Y
30.27%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBUD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
-6.38%144.52%34.69%6.34%0.11%-8.41%15.71%40.46%-6.02%-3.26%
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
2.80%49.32%34.57%9.32%7.12%4.03%13.05%21.25%3.20%-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between UBUD.DE and 4GLD.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2013

0.69

The correlation between UBUD.DE and 4GLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBUD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBUD.DE
UBUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBUD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBUD.DE4GLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.82

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

4.63

-0.57

UBUD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBUD.DE and 4GLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBUD.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.31

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.23

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.92

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.65

-0.38

Drawdowns

UBUD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.79%, which is greater than 4GLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUD.DE and 4GLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBUD.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.79%

-36.79%

-21.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.94%

-16.54%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.94%

-16.54%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.21%

-16.54%

-21.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.40%

-18.23%

-32.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.15%

-14.95%

-12.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-11.83%

-16.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.75%

6.52%

+5.23%

Volatility

UBUD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 5.09%. This indicates that UBUD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBUD.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.71%

5.09%

+8.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.92%

20.09%

+15.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.63%

23.06%

+22.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.68%

16.00%

+19.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.58%

14.37%

+21.21%

UBUD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBUD.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBUD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

UBUD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while 4GLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
0.59%0.40%0.56%1.74%1.12%1.15%0.44%0.42%0.48%0.46%0.43%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBUD.DE and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for UBUD.DE.

UBUD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. UBUD.DE tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for UBUD.DE and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBUD.DE and 4GLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer