UBRL vs. QTAP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

UBRL (GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UBRL returned -46.01% vs 20.30% for QTAP. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UBRL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

UBRL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF (UBRL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBRL achieves a -34.07% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.57% return.

UBRL

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -12.12%
• 6M: -30.61%
• YTD: -34.07%
• 1Y: -46.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -21.95%

QTAP

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 12.76%
• YTD: 13.57%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	$235.81K	$225.86K	$220.48K
UBRL GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF	$1.81M	$1.87M	$2.98M

UBRL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UBRL GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF	-34.07%	45.90%	-35.13%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	13.57%	19.36%	9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between UBRL and QTAP is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.30

Return for Risk

UBRL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UBRL

UBRL Risk / Return Rank: 4
UBRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
UBRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
UBRL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
UBRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
UBRL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UBRL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF (UBRL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UBRL	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	2.95	-3.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	4.74	-5.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.69	-0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	6.93	-7.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	33.23	-34.42

UBRL vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBRL Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBRL and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UBRL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBRL drawdown since its inception was -62.78%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBRL and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBRL	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.78%	-29.44%	-33.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.78%	-2.81%	-59.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.94%	-1.05%	-56.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.54%	-4.91%	-25.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.60%	0.59%	+39.01%

Volatility

UBRL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF (UBRL) has a higher volatility of 19.47% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.75%. This indicates that UBRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBRL	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.47%	2.75%	+16.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.61%	5.69%	+45.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.23%	6.61%	+61.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.17%	18.92%	+57.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	76.17%	18.57%	+57.60%

UBRL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBRL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBRL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

UBRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.84%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%
UBRL GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF	15.84%	10.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBRL and QTAP in my portfolio?

UBRL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UBRL or QTAP?

UBRL has higher volatility (19.47%) compared to QTAP (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBRL dropped -62.78% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, UBRL or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 20.30% vs -46.01% for UBRL. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UBRL or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 20.30% return vs -46.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UBRL or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for UBRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UBRL or QTAP?

UBRL has the higher dividend yield at 15.84%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

What is the main difference between UBRL and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for UBRL and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.