UBRL vs. CLIP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UBRL (GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBRL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. UBRL is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past year, UBRL returned -44.53% vs 3.95% for CLIP. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. UBRL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.

Performance

UBRL vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF (UBRL) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBRL achieves a -33.50% return, which is significantly lower than CLIP's 1.71% return.

UBRL

• 1D: -4.91%
• 1M: -7.71%
• YTD: -33.50%
• 6M: -32.37%
• 1Y: -44.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLIP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBRL vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UBRL GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF	-33.50%	45.90%	-35.13%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.71%	4.23%	1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between UBRL and CLIP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	-0.00

Return for Risk

UBRL vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBRL

UBRL Risk / Return Rank: 3
UBRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
UBRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
UBRL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
UBRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
UBRL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBRL vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF (UBRL) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UBRL	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	17.84	-18.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.81	80.86	-81.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	26.35	-25.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	141.67	-142.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	1,281.30	-1,282.55

UBRL vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBRL Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBRL and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UBRL vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBRL drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBRL and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBRL	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.45%	-0.08%	-58.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.45%	-0.03%	-58.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.57%	0.00%	-57.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.07%	-0.00%	-29.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.60%	0.00%	+35.60%

Volatility

UBRL vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF (UBRL) has a higher volatility of 20.84% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.07%. This indicates that UBRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBRL	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.84%	0.07%	+20.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.39%	0.15%	+47.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.32%	0.22%	+66.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.77%	0.44%	+75.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.77%	0.44%	+75.33%

UBRL vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBRL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBRL vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

UBRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.70%, more than CLIP's 3.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.90%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%
UBRL GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF	15.70%	10.44%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBRL and CLIP in my portfolio?

UBRL and CLIP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UBRL or CLIP?

UBRL has higher volatility (20.84%) compared to CLIP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBRL dropped -58.45% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, UBRL or CLIP?

On 1-year performance, CLIP leads with 3.95% vs -44.53% for UBRL. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UBRL or CLIP?

Over the 1-year period, CLIP has performed better with a 3.95% return vs -44.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UBRL or CLIP?

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for UBRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UBRL or CLIP?

UBRL has the higher dividend yield at 15.70%, compared with 3.90% for CLIP.

What is the main difference between UBRL and CLIP?

UBRL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for UBRL and 0.07% for CLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.84 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.