PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBPIX vs. UGPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBPIX achieves a 38.74% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -25.02% return. Over the past 10 years, UBPIX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 6.93%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -13.12% annualized return.


UBPIX

1D
1.94%
1M
-6.81%
YTD
38.74%
6M
35.97%
1Y
101.88%
3Y*
28.71%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
6.93%

UGPIX

1D
4.53%
1M
-6.19%
YTD
-25.02%
6M
-28.64%
1Y
-11.24%
3Y*
-5.13%
5Y*
-34.94%
10Y*
-13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBPIX
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund
38.74%88.27%-39.96%53.61%9.98%-10.66%-50.10%13.18%-22.18%46.59%
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
-25.02%36.28%-21.79%-11.49%-53.03%-73.86%76.47%40.07%-46.51%105.73%

Correlation

The correlation between UBPIX and UGPIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2007

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between UBPIX and UGPIX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBPIX
UBPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UBPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UBPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

UGPIX
UGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
UGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBPIXUGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.01

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

-0.19

+5.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.22

-0.34

+15.56

UBPIX vs. UGPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the UGPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBPIX and UGPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBPIXUGPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

-0.19

+2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

-0.09

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

-0.05

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

-0.05

-0.10

Drawdowns

UBPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.57%, roughly equal to the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBPIX and UGPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBPIXUGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.57%

-99.66%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.34%

-52.67%

+32.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.74%

-53.13%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.18%

-98.24%

+49.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.02%

-99.10%

+10.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.79%

-97.87%

+8.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.70%

-82.71%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

28.73%

-21.85%

Volatility

UBPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) is 11.36%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that UBPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBPIXUGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.36%

18.51%

-7.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.50%

36.57%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.04%

52.09%

-12.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.98%

390.11%

-344.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.05%

277.98%

-221.93%

UBPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBPIX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison

UBPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than UGPIX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UBPIX
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund
3.63%5.03%6.94%4.32%10.96%6.00%0.53%1.28%1.58%0.22%0.32%0.43%
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
8.06%6.05%2.91%3.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.00%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBPIX and UGPIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGPIX has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to UBPIX (11.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBPIX dropped -98.57% vs UGPIX's -99.66%.

UBPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBPIX and UGPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer