PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBPIX vs. BIPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBPIX vs. BIPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) and ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBPIX achieves a 29.19% return, which is significantly lower than BIPIX's 51.16% return. Over the past 10 years, UBPIX has underperformed BIPIX with an annualized return of 4.46%, while BIPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.


UBPIX

1D
0.88%
1M
-6.92%
6M
19.53%
YTD
29.19%
1Y
81.82%
3Y*
21.51%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
4.46%

BIPIX

1D
1.10%
1M
35.62%
6M
46.75%
YTD
51.16%
1Y
145.60%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBPIX vs. BIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBPIX
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund
29.19%88.27%-39.96%53.61%9.98%-10.66%-50.10%13.18%-22.18%46.59%
BIPIX
ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund
51.16%47.99%-25.91%9.55%-13.43%5.00%19.94%23.65%-12.15%34.71%

Correlation

The correlation between UBPIX and BIPIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2007

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBPIX vs. BIPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBPIX
UBPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
UBPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
UBPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

BIPIX
BIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBPIX vs. BIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) and ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBPIXBIPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

9.44

-6.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

27.61

-19.01

UBPIX vs. BIPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the BIPIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBPIX and BIPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBPIX vs. BIPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.57%, which is greater than BIPIX's maximum drawdown of -84.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBPIX and BIPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBPIXBIPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.57%

-84.51%

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.09%

-15.15%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.74%

-59.50%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.18%

-63.86%

+14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.02%

-63.86%

-25.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.49%

0.00%

-90.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.71%

-37.10%

-47.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.05%

5.17%

+3.88%

Volatility

UBPIX vs. BIPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) at 10.21%. This indicates that UBPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBPIXBIPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.94%

10.21%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.67%

31.83%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.07%

39.92%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.96%

40.15%

+5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.62%

36.44%

+19.18%

UBPIX vs. BIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBPIX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than BIPIX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBPIX vs. BIPIX - Dividend Comparison

UBPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than BIPIX's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIPIX
ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund
0.24%0.37%0.23%6.69%0.00%0.79%12.09%3.26%5.52%7.19%0.00%0.00%
UBPIX
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund
3.90%5.03%6.94%4.32%10.96%6.00%0.53%1.28%1.58%0.22%0.32%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBPIX and BIPIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBPIX has higher volatility (10.94%) compared to BIPIX (10.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBPIX dropped -98.57% vs BIPIX's -84.51%.

BIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBPIX and BIPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer