PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBND vs. UITB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBND vs. UITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBND achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly higher than UITB's -0.51% return.


UBND

1D
-0.30%
1M
-1.27%
6M
-0.51%
YTD
-0.40%
1Y
2.42%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.78%

UITB

1D
-0.25%
1M
-1.17%
6M
-0.70%
YTD
-0.51%
1Y
1.79%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.01M$8.32M$6.37M
$7.78M$6.55M$6.62M

UBND vs. UITB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UBND
VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF
-0.40%7.79%3.04%7.37%-12.72%0.14%
UITB
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF
-0.51%7.32%1.81%6.49%-12.23%-0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between UBND and UITB is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2021

0.90

The correlation between UBND and UITB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBND vs. UITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UBND
UBND Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
UBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

UITB
UITB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UITB Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
UITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
UITB Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UBND vs. UITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBNDUITBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

0.95

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

2.43

+0.93

UBND vs. UITB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the UITB Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBND and UITB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBND vs. UITB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBND drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, roughly equal to the maximum UITB drawdown of -17.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBND and UITB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBNDUITBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-17.02%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-2.80%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.29%

-4.75%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-2.29%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-4.29%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.10%

-0.15%

Volatility

UBND vs. UITB - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) have volatilities of 0.98% and 0.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBNDUITBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.94%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

2.82%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

3.60%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.75%

5.66%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.75%

4.96%

+0.79%

UBND vs. UITB - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than UITB's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBND vs. UITB - Dividend Comparison

UBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than UITB's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBND
VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF
4.90%4.56%4.63%4.37%3.28%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UITB
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF
4.25%4.04%3.89%3.14%2.32%1.95%2.79%3.01%2.99%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, UBND and UITB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UBND has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to UITB (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBND dropped -16.53% vs UITB's -17.02%.

On 3-year performance, UBND leads with 4.78% vs 4.28% for UITB. On fees, UITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UBND has performed better with a 4.78% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for UBND.

UBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 4.25% for UITB.

UBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while UITB is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UBND and 0.38% for UITB.

UBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBND and UITB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer