PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBND vs. IUSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBND vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBND achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than IUSB's 0.43% return.


UBND

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.23%
6M
0.36%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
10Y*

IUSB

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
1.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBND vs. IUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UBND
VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF
0.23%7.79%3.04%7.37%-12.72%0.12%
IUSB
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
0.43%7.38%2.11%6.23%-13.04%-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between UBND and IUSB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021

0.89

The correlation between UBND and IUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBND vs. IUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBND
UBND Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
UBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
UBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBND Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSB
IUSB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBND vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBNDIUSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.20

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.89

6.68

+0.21

UBND vs. IUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the IUSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBND and IUSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBNDIUSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.54

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.46

-0.30

Drawdowns

UBND vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBND drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum IUSB drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBND and IUSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBNDIUSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-17.90%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-2.53%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.07%

-5.82%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.33%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-3.59%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.83%

-0.01%

Volatility

UBND vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) have volatilities of 1.26% and 1.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBNDIUSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

1.24%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

2.62%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

3.62%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.80%

5.79%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.80%

5.04%

+0.76%

UBND vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBND vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison

UBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than IUSB's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSB
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
4.23%4.17%4.04%3.46%2.53%1.74%2.68%3.04%2.98%2.56%2.60%1.95%
UBND
VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF
4.77%4.56%4.63%4.37%3.28%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, UBND and IUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UBND has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to IUSB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBND dropped -16.53% vs IUSB's -17.90%.

On 3-year performance, UBND leads with 4.91% vs 4.51% for IUSB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UBND has performed better with a 4.91% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for UBND.

UBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.23% for IUSB.

They also come from different issuers: Victory and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UBND and 0.06% for IUSB.

UBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBND and IUSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer