PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBND vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UBND vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UBND vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UBND
VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF
-0.11%7.79%3.04%7.37%-12.72%0.12%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%9.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBND achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return.


UBND

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
1.03%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBND vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBND
UBND Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
UBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBND Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
UBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBND Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBND vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBND^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

0.92

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

1.41

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.41

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.37

6.61

-1.24

UBND vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBND and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBND^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.92

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.46

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between UBND and ^GSPC is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

UBND vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBND drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBND and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UBND^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-56.78%

+40.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-12.14%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-5.78%

+4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-10.75%

+5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.60%

-1.72%

Volatility

UBND vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) is 1.51%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that UBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UBND^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

5.37%

-3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

9.55%

-7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

18.33%

-14.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

16.90%

-11.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

18.05%

-12.18%