UBND vs. ^GSPC
UBND (VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF) is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Victory, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 3 years, UBND returned 5.00%/yr vs 19.20%/yr for ^GSPC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UBND vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBND achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 7.60% return.
UBND
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
^GSPC
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
UBND vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBND VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF | 0.53% | 7.79% | 3.04% | 7.37% | -12.72% | 0.14% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 7.60% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 10.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBND and ^GSPC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2021 | 0.21 |
The correlation between UBND and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBND vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
UBND
^GSPC
UBND vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBND | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.46 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 10.92 | -5.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBND vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBND drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBND and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBND | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -56.78% | +40.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.62% | -9.10% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.07% | -18.90% | +13.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -3.21% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -10.71% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 2.04% | -1.18% |
Volatility
UBND vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) is 1.11%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that UBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBND | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 4.89% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 9.93% | -7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.49% | 12.57% | -9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 17.00% | -11.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 18.08% | -12.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBND and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^GSPC has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to UBND (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBND dropped -16.53% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBND and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer