UBEW vs. QDTE

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

UBEW (Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBEW is a fund fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBEW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.

Performance

UBEW vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBEW achieves a -12.59% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 13.13% return.

UBEW

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 9.37%
• 6M: -16.34%
• YTD: -12.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDTE

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: 11.04%
• YTD: 13.13%
• 1Y: 28.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBEW vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF	-12.59%	-16.62%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	13.13%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between UBEW and QDTE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

UBEW vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBEW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 64
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBEW vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UBEW	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.66	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.81	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.52	—

Drawdowns

UBEW vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBEW drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBEW and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBEW	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.17%	-22.86%	-15.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.37%	-3.11%	-29.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.19%	-3.12%	-23.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UBEW	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.36%	17.26%	+26.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.36%	19.06%	+24.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.36%	19.06%	+24.30%

UBEW vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBEW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBEW vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

UBEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.89%, less than QDTE's 44.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.92%	49.49%	32.09%
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF	36.89%	8.98%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBEW and QDTE in my portfolio?

UBEW and QDTE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UBEW or QDTE?

On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UBEW or QDTE?

QDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UBEW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UBEW or QDTE?

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.92%, compared with 36.89% for UBEW.

What is the main difference between UBEW and QDTE?

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UBEW and 0.97% for QDTE.