UBEW vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UBEW (Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBEW is a fund fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. UBEW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

UBEW vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBEW achieves a -15.76% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 12.42% return.

UBEW

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -3.71%
• YTD: -15.76%
• 6M: -26.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 31.40%
• 3Y*: 10.81%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBEW vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF	-15.76%	-17.23%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	12.42%	2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between UBEW and DBMF is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

UBEW vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 83
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBEW vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UBEW	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.07	0.77	-1.84

Drawdowns

UBEW vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBEW drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBEW and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBEW	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.34%	-20.39%	-16.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.82%	0.00%	-34.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.96%	-6.59%	-18.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.65%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UBEW	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.34%	12.17%	+30.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.34%	12.52%	+29.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.34%	12.41%	+29.93%

UBEW vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBEW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBEW vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

UBEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.85%, more than DBMF's 5.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.09%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF	31.85%	8.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBEW and DBMF in my portfolio?

UBEW and DBMF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UBEW or DBMF?

On fees, DBMF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UBEW or DBMF?

DBMF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UBEW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UBEW or DBMF?

UBEW has the higher dividend yield at 31.85%, compared with 5.09% for DBMF.

What is the main difference between UBEW and DBMF?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UBEW and 0.85% for DBMF.