UBER vs. ZS
UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) and ZS (Zscaler, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — UBER in Software - Application, ZS in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past 5 years, UBER returned 8.72%/yr vs -8.30%/yr for ZS. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UBER vs. ZS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBER achieves a -11.68% return, which is significantly higher than ZS's -33.39% return.
UBER
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- -14.94%
- YTD
- -11.68%
- 1Y
- -20.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.81%
ZS
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 20.00%
- 6M
- -29.98%
- YTD
- -33.39%
- 1Y
- -48.11%
- 3Y*
- 0.18%
- 5Y*
- -8.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.53%
UBER vs. ZS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | -11.68% | 35.46% | -2.03% | 148.97% | -41.02% | -17.78% | 71.49% | -29.19% |
ZS Zscaler, Inc. | -33.39% | 24.67% | -18.57% | 98.00% | -65.18% | 60.90% | 329.48% | -32.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBER and ZS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UBER and ZS has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
UBER:
$146.91B
ZS:
$24.23B
UBER:
$4.07
ZS:
-$0.49
UBER:
2.82
ZS:
7.50
UBER:
6.04
ZS:
10.18
UBER:
$53.69B
ZS:
$3.17B
UBER:
$22.03B
ZS:
$2.43B
UBER:
$5.85B
ZS:
$69.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBER vs. ZS — Risk / Return Rank
UBER
ZS
UBER vs. ZS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBER | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.86 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.74 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -1.18 | +0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBER vs. ZS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, smaller than the maximum ZS drawdown of -76.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and ZS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBER | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -76.41% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.46% | -64.89% | +33.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.46% | -64.89% | +33.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.69% | -76.41% | +18.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.90% | -59.37% | +31.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.69% | -33.02% | +7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.64% | 40.81% | -21.17% |
Volatility
UBER vs. ZS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is 11.96%, while Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a volatility of 14.43%. This indicates that UBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBER | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | 14.43% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 58.88% | -33.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.85% | 60.29% | -26.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.04% | 56.40% | -11.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.53% | 58.68% | -8.15% |
Dividends
UBER vs. ZS - Dividend Comparison
Neither UBER nor ZS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
UBER vs. ZS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uber Technologies, Inc. and Zscaler, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UBER vs. ZS - Profitability Comparison
UBER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.
ZS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.82M and revenue of 850.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.
UBER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.
ZS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.64M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.
UBER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
ZS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a net income of -13.88M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in a net margin of -1.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UBER and ZS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZS has higher volatility (14.43%) compared to UBER (11.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBER dropped -68.05% vs ZS's -76.41%.
UBER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBER and ZS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer