UBER vs. XLM-USD
UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, UBER returned 6.60%/yr vs -11.45%/yr for XLM-USD. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UBER vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBER achieves a -15.74% return, which is significantly lower than XLM-USD's -6.87% return.
UBER
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -15.74%
- 6M
- -19.10%
- 1Y
- -17.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- —
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
UBER vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | -15.74% | 35.46% | -2.03% | 148.97% | -41.02% | -17.78% | 71.49% | -29.19% |
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -49.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBER and XLM-USD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBER vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
UBER
XLM-USD
UBER vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBER | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.00 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.40 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | -0.57 | -0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBER vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, smaller than the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and XLM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBER | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -96.21% | +28.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.46% | -71.19% | +39.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.46% | -74.37% | +42.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.45% | -83.25% | +22.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.22% | -78.80% | +47.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.67% | -72.14% | +46.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.93% | 50.48% | -32.55% |
Volatility
UBER vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is 7.96%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 43.48%. This indicates that UBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBER | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 43.48% | -35.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.21% | 59.28% | -36.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.66% | 70.60% | -37.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.82% | 74.72% | -29.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.61% | 112.79% | -62.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBER and XLM-USD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to UBER (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBER dropped -68.05% vs XLM-USD's -96.21%.
XLM-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBER and XLM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer