UBER vs. QFIN
UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) and QFIN (360 DigiTech, Inc.) are both stocks. UBER operates in Software - Application (Technology), while QFIN operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, UBER returned 6.60%/yr vs -12.03%/yr for QFIN. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UBER vs. QFIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UBER having a -15.74% return and QFIN slightly higher at -15.31%.
UBER
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -15.74%
- 6M
- -19.10%
- 1Y
- -17.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- —
QFIN
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 17.56%
- YTD
- -15.31%
- 6M
- -17.62%
- 1Y
- -59.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- -12.03%
- 10Y*
- —
UBER vs. QFIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | -15.74% | 35.46% | -2.03% | 148.97% | -41.02% | -17.78% | 71.49% | -29.19% |
QFIN 360 DigiTech, Inc. | -15.31% | -47.46% | 162.76% | -16.28% | -6.54% | 97.15% | 20.68% | -52.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBER and QFIN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.25 |
The correlation between UBER and QFIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UBER:
$142.62B
QFIN:
$948.90M
UBER:
$4.05
QFIN:
CN¥51.00
UBER:
16.98
QFIN:
2.05
UBER:
0.11
QFIN:
0.06
UBER:
2.70
QFIN:
0.59
UBER:
5.76
QFIN:
0.26
UBER:
$53.69B
QFIN:
CN¥17.46B
UBER:
$22.03B
QFIN:
CN¥12.90B
UBER:
$5.85B
QFIN:
CN¥6.93B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBER vs. QFIN — Risk / Return Rank
UBER
QFIN
UBER vs. QFIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and 360 DigiTech, Inc. (QFIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBER | QFIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.76 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.83 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | -1.13 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBER vs. QFIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, smaller than the maximum QFIN drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and QFIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBER | QFIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -76.74% | +8.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.46% | -72.31% | +40.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.46% | -73.15% | +41.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.45% | -76.74% | +16.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.22% | -64.51% | +33.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.67% | -45.54% | +19.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.93% | 53.01% | -35.08% |
Volatility
UBER vs. QFIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is 7.96%, while 360 DigiTech, Inc. (QFIN) has a volatility of 29.45%. This indicates that UBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBER | QFIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 29.45% | -21.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.21% | 38.71% | -15.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.66% | 55.12% | -22.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.82% | 66.39% | -21.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.61% | 72.04% | -21.43% |
Dividends
UBER vs. QFIN - Dividend Comparison
UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QFIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFIN 360 DigiTech, Inc. | 10.00% | 7.58% | 4.56% | 7.27% | 4.03% | 1.22% |
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UBER vs. QFIN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uber Technologies, Inc. and 360 DigiTech, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UBER vs. QFIN - Profitability Comparison
UBER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.
QFIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 360 DigiTech, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.95B and revenue of 3.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.8%.
UBER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.
QFIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 360 DigiTech, Inc. reported an operating income of 928.25M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
UBER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
QFIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 360 DigiTech, Inc. reported a net income of 877.98M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in a net margin of 22.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UBER and QFIN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QFIN has higher volatility (29.45%) compared to UBER (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBER dropped -68.05% vs QFIN's -76.74%.
UBER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBER and QFIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer