UBER vs. BKNG
UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) and BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. UBER operates in Software - Application (Technology), while BKNG operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, UBER returned 6.53%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for BKNG. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UBER vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBER achieves a -16.03% return, which is significantly higher than BKNG's -24.65% return.
UBER
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- -9.90%
- YTD
- -16.03%
- 6M
- -18.48%
- 1Y
- -20.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- —
BKNG
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- -24.65%
- 6M
- -23.53%
- 1Y
- -26.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
UBER vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | -16.03% | 35.46% | -2.03% | 148.97% | -41.02% | -17.78% | 71.49% | -29.19% |
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | -24.65% | 8.59% | 41.31% | 76.02% | -16.00% | 7.72% | 8.45% | 18.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBER and BKNG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.44 |
The correlation between UBER and BKNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UBER:
$142.12B
BKNG:
$127.55B
UBER:
$4.05
BKNG:
$7.60
UBER:
16.92
BKNG:
21.14
UBER:
0.11
BKNG:
0.32
UBER:
2.69
BKNG:
4.70
UBER:
$53.69B
BKNG:
$27.69B
UBER:
$22.03B
BKNG:
$22.16B
UBER:
$5.85B
BKNG:
$9.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBER vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank
UBER
BKNG
UBER vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBER | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.87 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.79 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | -1.51 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBER | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | -0.82 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.38 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
UBER vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and BKNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBER | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -99.32% | +31.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.46% | -33.35% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.46% | -33.35% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.45% | -39.53% | -20.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.46% | -30.36% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.66% | -47.06% | +21.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.72% | 17.35% | +0.37% |
Volatility
UBER vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison
Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) at 7.52%. This indicates that UBER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBER | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 7.52% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.06% | 26.80% | -2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.62% | 31.88% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.83% | 32.26% | +12.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.64% | 32.45% | +18.19% |
Dividends
UBER vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison
UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 1.00% | 0.72% | 0.70% |
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UBER vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uber Technologies, Inc. and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UBER vs. BKNG - Profitability Comparison
UBER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.
BKNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
UBER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.
BKNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
UBER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
BKNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UBER and BKNG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UBER has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to BKNG (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBER dropped -68.05% vs BKNG's -99.32%.
UBER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBER and BKNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer