RCAT vs. PLTR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR).

Performance

RCAT vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RCAT vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc.	65.07%	-38.29%	1,360.23%	-6.38%	-54.81%	-30.67%	455.56%
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc.	-17.70%	135.03%	340.48%	167.45%	-64.74%	-22.68%	147.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RCAT : $1.56B PLTR : $376.45B
EPS RCAT : -$0.71 PLTR : $0.63
PS Ratio RCAT : 32.62 PLTR : 83.88
PB Ratio RCAT : 6.36 PLTR : 50.96
Total Revenue (TTM) RCAT : $40.73M PLTR : $4.48B
Gross Profit (TTM) RCAT : $1.28M PLTR : $3.69B
EBITDA (TTM) RCAT : -$60.91M PLTR : $1.52B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCAT achieves a 65.07% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -17.70% return.

RCAT

• 1D: 12.94%
• 1M: 12.36%
• YTD: 65.07%
• 6M: 26.47%
• 1Y: 122.62%
• 3Y*: 132.61%
• 5Y*: 25.14%
• 10Y*: —

PLTR

• 1D: 6.35%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: -17.70%
• 6M: -19.81%
• 1Y: 73.32%
• 3Y*: 158.69%
• 5Y*: 44.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RCAT vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCAT

RCAT Risk / Return Rank: 77
RCAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
RCAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RCAT Omega Ratio Rank: 74
RCAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RCAT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PLTR

PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 77
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCAT vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RCAT	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.28	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	1.85	+0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.24	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	1.86	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.43	4.55	-0.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCAT vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCAT and PLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCAT	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	1.28	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.69	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	0.92	-0.98

Correlation

The correlation between RCAT and PLTR is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RCAT vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither RCAT nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

RCAT vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCAT drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCAT and PLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCAT	PLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.76%	-84.62%	-15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.08%	-37.81%	-22.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.25%	-79.14%	-13.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.15%	-29.39%	-62.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-95.58%	-40.57%	-55.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.61%	15.48%	+12.13%

Volatility

RCAT vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) has a higher volatility of 37.54% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 14.75%. This indicates that RCAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCAT	PLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.54%	14.75%	+22.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	84.17%	37.73%	+46.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	120.21%	57.68%	+62.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.24%	65.50%	+48.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	251.41%	70.22%	+181.19%

Financials

RCAT vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Red Cat Holdings, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RCAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Red Cat Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11M and revenue of 26.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.2%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 1.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.7%.

RCAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Red Cat Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.91M and revenue of 26.24M, resulting in an operating margin of -75.9%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 575.39M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.9%.

RCAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Red Cat Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -19.66M and revenue of 26.24M, resulting in a net margin of -74.9%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 608.68M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in a net margin of 43.3%.