UAPR vs. NVDO
UAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. UAPR is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
UAPR vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAPR achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.
UAPR
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UAPR vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April | 6.99% | 3.09% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 18.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAPR and NVDO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAPR vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
UAPR
NVDO
UAPR vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 71.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.30 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
UAPR vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAPR drawdown since its inception was -14.61%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAPR and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -16.25% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -2.68% | +2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -4.99% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | — | — |
Volatility
UAPR vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20% | 31.93% | -28.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.88% | 31.93% | -25.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.42% | 31.93% | -23.51% |
UAPR vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
UAPR vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
UAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.02% | 16.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UAPR and NVDO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UAPR.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for UAPR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UAPR and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for UAPR and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer