PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAPR vs. XBAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UAPR vs. XBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UAPR vs. XBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April
1.83%6.27%12.38%10.60%-5.67%4.41%
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
1.23%13.38%11.55%20.53%-7.59%7.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAPR achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than XBAP's 1.23% return.


UAPR

1D
0.36%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.83%
6M
3.83%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*

XBAP

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.23%
6M
3.38%
1Y
12.13%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UAPR vs. XBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UAPR and XBAP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

UAPR vs. XBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAPR
UAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
UAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
UAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAP
XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAPR vs. XBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UAPRXBAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.21

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

1.83

+0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.45

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.61

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.95

10.81

+4.14

UAPR vs. XBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the XBAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAPR and XBAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UAPRXBAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.21

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.90

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between UAPR and XBAP is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UAPR vs. XBAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither UAPR nor XBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
UAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.17%
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UAPR vs. XBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAPR drawdown since its inception was -14.61%, roughly equal to the maximum XBAP drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAPR and XBAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UAPRXBAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.61%

-14.57%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.58%

-8.25%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-1.80%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

1.23%

-0.40%

Volatility

UAPR vs. XBAP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) at 0.52%. This indicates that UAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UAPRXBAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.52%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.12%

1.75%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.16%

10.12%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.88%

9.99%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.50%

9.99%

-1.49%