UAA vs. EDU
UAA (Under Armour, Inc.) and EDU (New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.) are both stocks. UAA operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while EDU operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, UAA returned -16.61%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for EDU. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UAA vs. EDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a 21.73% return, which is significantly higher than EDU's -14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, UAA has underperformed EDU with an annualized return of -16.61%, while EDU has yielded a comparatively higher 2.24% annualized return.
UAA
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 18.16%
- YTD
- 21.73%
- 6M
- 39.72%
- 1Y
- -8.33%
- 3Y*
- -7.28%
- 5Y*
- -22.39%
- 10Y*
- -16.61%
EDU
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- -8.94%
- YTD
- -14.20%
- 6M
- -12.40%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- -12.75%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
UAA vs. EDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAA Under Armour, Inc. | 21.73% | -39.98% | -5.80% | -13.48% | -52.05% | 23.41% | -20.51% | 22.24% | 22.45% | -50.33% |
EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | -14.20% | -13.27% | -11.55% | 110.45% | 65.81% | -88.70% | 53.25% | 121.22% | -41.69% | 124.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAA and EDU is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2006 | 0.22 |
The correlation between UAA and EDU shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UAA:
$2.58B
EDU:
$7.45B
UAA:
-$1.16
EDU:
$2.63
UAA:
0.52
EDU:
1.39
UAA:
1.82
EDU:
1.82
UAA:
$4.97B
EDU:
$5.39B
UAA:
$2.26B
EDU:
$2.96B
UAA:
-$36.44M
EDU:
$716.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAA vs. EDU — Risk / Return Rank
UAA
EDU
UAA vs. EDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UAA | EDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.03 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.01 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 0.02 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UAA vs. EDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, roughly equal to the maximum EDU drawdown of -95.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and EDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAA | EDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.99% | -95.61% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.42% | -28.22% | -15.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.53% | -56.77% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.53% | -90.94% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.43% | -95.61% | +5.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.38% | -75.49% | -12.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.82% | -33.03% | -12.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.44% | 12.44% | +15.00% |
Volatility
UAA vs. EDU - Volatility Comparison
Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) has a higher volatility of 11.61% compared to New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) at 8.29%. This indicates that UAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAA | EDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.61% | 8.29% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.37% | 23.39% | +19.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.87% | 37.56% | +17.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.74% | 71.33% | -18.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.12% | 59.54% | -7.42% |
Dividends
UAA vs. EDU - Dividend Comparison
UAA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 2.57% | 1.09% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 1.28% |
UAA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UAA vs. EDU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UAA vs. EDU - Profitability Comparison
UAA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 492.04M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.
EDU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 766.52M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.
UAA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
EDU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported an operating income of 181.59M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.
UAA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.
EDU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported a net income of 127.71M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UAA and EDU have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UAA has higher volatility (11.61%) compared to EDU (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAA dropped -91.99% vs EDU's -95.61%.
EDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAA and EDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer