UAA vs. CPNG
UAA (Under Armour, Inc.) and CPNG (Coupang, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — UAA in Apparel Manufacturing, CPNG in Internet Retail. Over the past 5 years, UAA returned -22.39%/yr vs -15.31%/yr for CPNG. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UAA vs. CPNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a 21.73% return, which is significantly higher than CPNG's -28.70% return.
UAA
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 18.16%
- YTD
- 21.73%
- 6M
- 39.72%
- 1Y
- -8.33%
- 3Y*
- -7.28%
- 5Y*
- -22.39%
- 10Y*
- -16.61%
CPNG
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- -28.70%
- 6M
- -34.37%
- 1Y
- -40.14%
- 3Y*
- 0.44%
- 5Y*
- -15.31%
- 10Y*
- —
UAA vs. CPNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAA Under Armour, Inc. | 21.73% | -39.98% | -5.80% | -13.48% | -52.05% | -5.99% |
CPNG Coupang, Inc. | -28.70% | 7.32% | 35.76% | 10.06% | -49.93% | -53.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAA and CPNG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2021 | 0.31 |
The correlation between UAA and CPNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UAA:
$2.58B
CPNG:
$30.70B
UAA:
-$1.16
CPNG:
-$0.09
UAA:
0.52
CPNG:
1.09
UAA:
1.82
CPNG:
7.81
UAA:
$4.97B
CPNG:
$28.65B
UAA:
$2.26B
CPNG:
$3.65B
UAA:
-$36.44M
CPNG:
$80.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAA vs. CPNG — Risk / Return Rank
UAA
CPNG
UAA vs. CPNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Coupang, Inc. (CPNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UAA | CPNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.83 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | -0.74 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | -1.32 | +0.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UAA vs. CPNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, which is greater than CPNG's maximum drawdown of -85.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and CPNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAA | CPNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.99% | -85.28% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.42% | -54.91% | +11.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.53% | -54.91% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.53% | -79.01% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.38% | -73.51% | -14.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.82% | -64.19% | +18.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.44% | 30.85% | -3.41% |
Volatility
UAA vs. CPNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) is 11.61%, while Coupang, Inc. (CPNG) has a volatility of 21.03%. This indicates that UAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAA | CPNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.61% | 21.03% | -9.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.37% | 39.57% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.87% | 44.14% | +10.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.74% | 52.50% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.12% | 53.74% | -1.62% |
Dividends
UAA vs. CPNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither UAA nor CPNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
UAA vs. CPNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Coupang, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UAA and CPNG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPNG has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to UAA (11.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAA dropped -91.99% vs CPNG's -85.28%.
UAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAA and CPNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer