PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UA vs. WBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UA vs. WBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UA

1D
0.86%
1M
17.84%
YTD
22.50%
6M
41.35%
1Y
-4.85%
3Y*
-5.28%
5Y*
-20.46%
10Y*
-16.19%

WBA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UA vs. WBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UA
Under Armour, Inc.
22.50%-35.66%-10.66%-6.39%-50.55%21.24%-22.42%18.61%21.40%-47.08%
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
0.00%28.40%-61.34%-25.09%-25.06%35.78%-29.38%-10.99%-3.65%-10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between UA and WBA is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016

0.32

The correlation between UA and WBA shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

UA:

$4.97B

WBA:

$154.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UA:

$2.26B

WBA:

$26.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

UA:

-$86.93M

WBA:

-$2.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UA vs. WBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UA
UA Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
UA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

WBA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UA vs. WBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UAWBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.33

UA vs. WBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UA vs. WBA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UAWBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.26%

Volatility

UA vs. WBA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UAWBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.37%

Dividends

UA vs. WBA - Dividend Comparison

Neither UA nor WBA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UA
Under Armour, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
0.00%0.00%10.72%7.35%5.13%3.62%4.64%3.04%2.46%2.13%1.78%1.64%

Financials

UA vs. WBA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
1.15B
38.99B
(UA) Total Revenue
(WBA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UA and WBA have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UA and WBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer