WBA vs. GSK
Compare and contrast key facts about Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) and GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WBA or GSK.
Correlation
The correlation between WBA and GSK is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WBA vs. GSK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WBA:
-1.14
GSK:
-0.16
WBA:
-1.98
GSK:
-0.07
WBA:
0.75
GSK:
0.99
WBA:
-0.68
GSK:
-0.14
WBA:
-1.28
GSK:
-0.29
WBA:
47.15%
GSK:
11.85%
WBA:
52.64%
GSK:
22.00%
WBA:
-87.93%
GSK:
-55.21%
WBA:
-85.89%
GSK:
-25.07%
Fundamentals
WBA:
$8.61B
GSK:
$69.84B
WBA:
-$10.01
GSK:
$1.54
WBA:
3.55
GSK:
0.76
WBA:
$110.95B
GSK:
$31.27B
WBA:
$19.75B
GSK:
$22.46B
WBA:
-$11.89B
GSK:
$7.73B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBA achieves a -61.21% return, which is significantly lower than GSK's -5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, WBA has underperformed GSK with an annualized return of -15.54%, while GSK has yielded a comparatively higher 2.44% annualized return.
WBA
-61.21%
12.92%
-37.77%
-60.13%
-26.77%
-15.54%
GSK
-5.76%
0.75%
-15.26%
-5.12%
-2.67%
2.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WBA vs. GSK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) and GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WBA vs. GSK - Dividend Comparison
WBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than GSK's 4.63% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBA Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. | 10.68% | 7.35% | 5.13% | 3.63% | 4.64% | 3.05% | 2.46% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.64% | 1.71% | 2.05% |
GSK GlaxoSmithKline plc | 4.63% | 3.75% | 4.78% | 4.92% | 5.49% | 4.28% | 5.55% | 5.72% | 7.06% | 5.96% | 6.09% | 4.43% |
Drawdowns
WBA vs. GSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBA drawdown since its inception was -87.93%, which is greater than GSK's maximum drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBA and GSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WBA vs. GSK - Volatility Comparison
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) has a higher volatility of 21.99% compared to GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) at 6.78%. This indicates that WBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WBA vs. GSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities