PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UA vs. OLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UA vs. OLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Olin Corporation (OLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UA having a 22.50% return and OLN slightly lower at 22.46%. Over the past 10 years, UA has underperformed OLN with an annualized return of -16.19%, while OLN has yielded a comparatively higher 3.32% annualized return.


UA

1D
0.86%
1M
17.84%
YTD
22.50%
6M
41.35%
1Y
-4.85%
3Y*
-5.28%
5Y*
-20.46%
10Y*
-16.19%

OLN

1D
3.84%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
22.46%
6M
15.01%
1Y
27.48%
3Y*
-19.68%
5Y*
-10.59%
10Y*
3.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UA vs. OLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UA
Under Armour, Inc.
22.50%-35.66%-10.66%-6.39%-50.55%21.24%-22.42%18.61%21.40%-47.08%
OLN
Olin Corporation
22.46%-36.15%-36.29%3.46%-6.63%138.55%50.81%-10.77%-41.88%42.51%

Correlation

The correlation between UA and OLN is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016

0.37

The correlation between UA and OLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UA:

$2.50B

OLN:

$2.86B

EPS

UA:

-$1.16

OLN:

-$1.11

PS Ratio

UA:

0.51

OLN:

0.43

PB Ratio

UA:

1.77

OLN:

1.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

UA:

$4.97B

OLN:

$6.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UA:

$2.26B

OLN:

$352.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

UA:

-$86.93M

OLN:

$374.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UA vs. OLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UA
UA Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
UA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

OLN
OLN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
OLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLN Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UA vs. OLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Olin Corporation (OLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UAOLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.12

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

0.75

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.33

1.73

-2.06

UA vs. OLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UA Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the OLN Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UA and OLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UA vs. OLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UA drawdown since its inception was -91.34%, which is greater than OLN's maximum drawdown of -73.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UA and OLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UAOLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.34%

-73.80%

-17.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.86%

-31.45%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.16%

-69.26%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.50%

-71.87%

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.92%

-73.80%

-16.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.14%

-58.94%

-28.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.19%

-24.97%

-44.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.26%

13.58%

+12.68%

Volatility

UA vs. OLN - Volatility Comparison

Under Armour, Inc. (UA) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Olin Corporation (OLN) at 9.59%. This indicates that UA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UAOLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

9.59%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.31%

38.93%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.90%

55.61%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.27%

44.90%

+5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.37%

47.12%

+3.25%

Dividends

UA vs. OLN - Dividend Comparison

UA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OLN
Olin Corporation
3.18%3.84%2.37%1.48%1.51%1.39%3.26%4.64%3.98%2.25%3.12%4.63%
UA
Under Armour, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UA vs. OLN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Olin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.15B
1.58B
(UA) Total Revenue
(OLN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UA vs. OLN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Under Armour, Inc. and Olin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
40.3%
0
Portfolio components
UA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 465.14M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

OLN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

OLN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported an operating income of -78.30M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.0%.

UA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.

OLN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported a net income of -83.00M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UA and OLN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UA has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to OLN (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UA dropped -91.34% vs OLN's -73.80%.

OLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UA and OLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer