UA vs. CLX
UA (Under Armour, Inc.) and CLX (The Clorox Company) are both stocks. UA operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while CLX operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, UA returned -16.19%/yr vs -0.20%/yr for CLX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UA vs. CLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UA achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than CLX's -1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, UA has underperformed CLX with an annualized return of -16.19%, while CLX has yielded a comparatively higher -0.20% annualized return.
UA
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 17.84%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 6M
- 41.35%
- 1Y
- -4.85%
- 3Y*
- -5.28%
- 5Y*
- -20.46%
- 10Y*
- -16.19%
CLX
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- -4.70%
- 1Y
- -17.78%
- 3Y*
- -11.57%
- 5Y*
- -8.21%
- 10Y*
- -0.20%
UA vs. CLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 22.50% | -35.66% | -10.66% | -6.39% | -50.55% | 21.24% | -22.42% | 18.61% | 21.40% | -47.08% |
CLX The Clorox Company | -1.69% | -35.59% | 17.72% | 4.99% | -17.00% | -11.50% | 34.46% | 2.23% | 6.55% | 27.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between UA and CLX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016 | 0.09 |
Over the past year, UA and CLX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
UA:
$2.50B
CLX:
$11.79B
UA:
-$1.16
CLX:
$6.17
UA:
0.51
CLX:
1.76
UA:
$4.97B
CLX:
$6.76B
UA:
$2.26B
CLX:
$2.96B
UA:
-$86.93M
CLX:
$1.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UA vs. CLX — Risk / Return Rank
UA
CLX
UA vs. CLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and The Clorox Company (CLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UA | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.89 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | -0.65 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | -1.33 | +1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UA vs. CLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UA drawdown since its inception was -91.34%, which is greater than CLX's maximum drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UA and CLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UA | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.34% | -56.34% | -35.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.86% | -31.52% | -11.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.16% | -46.11% | -14.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.50% | -46.11% | -36.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.92% | -56.34% | -33.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.14% | -50.92% | -36.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -13.43% | -55.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.26% | 15.49% | +10.77% |
Volatility
UA vs. CLX - Volatility Comparison
Under Armour, Inc. (UA) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to The Clorox Company (CLX) at 10.45%. This indicates that UA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UA | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.83% | 10.45% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.31% | 23.46% | +19.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.90% | 28.17% | +25.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.27% | 26.09% | +24.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.37% | 24.51% | +25.86% |
Dividends
UA vs. CLX - Dividend Comparison
UA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLX The Clorox Company | 5.12% | 4.88% | 2.98% | 3.34% | 3.33% | 2.60% | 2.15% | 2.63% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 2.62% | 2.38% |
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UA vs. CLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and The Clorox Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UA vs. CLX - Profitability Comparison
UA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 465.14M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
CLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Clorox Company reported a gross profit of 722.00M and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.2%.
UA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
CLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Clorox Company reported an operating income of 466.00M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.9%.
UA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
CLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Clorox Company reported a net income of 187.00M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UA and CLX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UA has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to CLX (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UA dropped -91.34% vs CLX's -56.34%.
UA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UA and CLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer