PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLX vs. PEP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLXPEP
YTD Return17.98%-1.19%
1Y Return27.51%1.02%
3Y Return (Ann)2.96%3.20%
5Y Return (Ann)4.89%7.29%
10Y Return (Ann)7.75%8.50%
Sharpe Ratio1.320.07
Sortino Ratio2.030.22
Omega Ratio1.251.03
Calmar Ratio0.680.08
Martin Ratio3.540.25
Ulcer Index7.61%4.64%
Daily Std Dev20.48%15.83%
Max Drawdown-54.12%-40.41%
Current Drawdown-22.33%-12.56%

Fundamentals


CLXPEP
Market Cap$20.14B$225.98B
EPS$2.88$6.65
PE Ratio56.4924.77
PEG Ratio0.771.96
Total Revenue (TTM)$7.47B$91.92B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.32B$50.43B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.30B$17.69B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CLX and PEP is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CLX vs. PEP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLX achieves a 17.98% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's -1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CLX has underperformed PEP with an annualized return of 7.75%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively higher 8.50% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.86%
-6.46%
CLX
PEP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLX vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Clorox Company (CLX) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLX, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLX, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLX, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.68
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLX, currently valued at 3.54, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.54
PEP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PEP, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PEP, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PEP, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PEP, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PEP, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.25

CLX vs. PEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLX and PEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.32
0.07
CLX
PEP

Dividends

CLX vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison

CLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than PEP's 3.21% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLX
The Clorox Company
2.97%3.34%3.33%2.60%2.15%2.63%2.41%2.21%2.62%2.38%2.78%2.91%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
3.21%2.92%2.51%2.45%2.71%2.78%3.25%2.64%2.83%2.76%2.68%2.70%

Drawdowns

CLX vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLX drawdown since its inception was -54.12%, which is greater than PEP's maximum drawdown of -40.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLX and PEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-22.33%
-12.56%
CLX
PEP

Volatility

CLX vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison

The Clorox Company (CLX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 3.39%. This indicates that CLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.53%
3.39%
CLX
PEP

Financials

CLX vs. PEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Clorox Company and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items