UA vs. BMY
UA (Under Armour, Inc.) and BMY (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) are both stocks. UA operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while BMY operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, UA returned -16.19%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BMY. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UA vs. BMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UA achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than BMY's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, UA has underperformed BMY with an annualized return of -16.19%, while BMY has yielded a comparatively higher 1.00% annualized return.
UA
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 17.84%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 6M
- 41.35%
- 1Y
- -4.85%
- 3Y*
- -5.28%
- 5Y*
- -20.46%
- 10Y*
- -16.19%
BMY
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 0.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 1.00%
UA vs. BMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 22.50% | -35.66% | -10.66% | -6.39% | -50.55% | 21.24% | -22.42% | 18.61% | 21.40% | -47.08% |
BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 8.27% | 0.11% | 15.81% | -26.14% | 18.98% | 2.88% | 0.41% | 27.74% | -12.90% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between UA and BMY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
UA:
$2.50B
BMY:
$116.75B
UA:
-$1.16
BMY:
$3.57
UA:
0.51
BMY:
2.40
UA:
1.77
BMY:
5.82
UA:
$4.97B
BMY:
$48.48B
UA:
$2.26B
BMY:
$33.33B
UA:
-$86.93M
BMY:
$13.34B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UA vs. BMY — Risk / Return Rank
UA
BMY
UA vs. BMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UA | BMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.14 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 1.53 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 3.32 | -3.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UA vs. BMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UA drawdown since its inception was -91.34%, which is greater than BMY's maximum drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UA and BMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UA | BMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.34% | -72.03% | -19.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.86% | -12.05% | -30.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.16% | -36.85% | -23.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.50% | -47.67% | -34.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.92% | -47.67% | -42.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.14% | -17.79% | -69.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -22.38% | -46.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.26% | 6.34% | +19.92% |
Volatility
UA vs. BMY - Volatility Comparison
Under Armour, Inc. (UA) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) at 8.22%. This indicates that UA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UA | BMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.83% | 8.22% | +3.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.31% | 18.18% | +25.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.90% | 27.08% | +26.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.27% | 24.02% | +26.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.37% | 25.29% | +25.08% |
Dividends
UA vs. BMY - Dividend Comparison
UA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 4.38% | 4.60% | 4.24% | 4.44% | 3.00% | 2.36% | 3.69% | 2.55% | 3.08% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 2.17% |
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UA vs. BMY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UA vs. BMY - Profitability Comparison
UA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 465.14M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
BMY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a gross profit of 8.07B and revenue of 11.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.
UA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
BMY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported an operating income of 3.27B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.
UA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
BMY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a net income of 2.68B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UA and BMY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UA has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to BMY (8.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UA dropped -91.34% vs BMY's -72.03%.
BMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UA and BMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer