PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U-U.TO vs. FCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

U-U.TO vs. FCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

U-U.TO is traded in CAD, while FCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FCX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U-U.TO achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than FCX's 38.21% return.


U-U.TO

1D
-0.86%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
2.95%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
11.36%
5Y*
10Y*

FCX

1D
3.42%
1M
4.02%
YTD
38.21%
6M
47.29%
1Y
72.01%
3Y*
23.24%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
23.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U-U.TO vs. FCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
U-U.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
-5.18%12.78%-18.83%82.05%6.27%19.41%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
38.21%29.23%-1.74%10.98%-2.07%20.54%

Correlation

The correlation between U-U.TO and FCX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.34

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U-U.TO vs. FCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U-U.TO
U-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
U-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FCX
FCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U-U.TO vs. FCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


U-U.TOFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.27

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

3.00

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

7.73

-7.04

U-U.TO vs. FCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the FCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U-U.TO and FCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

U-U.TO vs. FCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.74%, smaller than the maximum FCX drawdown of -89.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U-U.TO and FCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U-U.TOFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.74%

-89.39%

+40.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.11%

-24.11%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.74%

-44.48%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.31%

-3.60%

-22.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-34.53%

+12.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.91%

9.34%

+2.57%

Volatility

U-U.TO vs. FCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) is 6.22%, while Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) has a volatility of 18.12%. This indicates that U-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U-U.TOFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

18.12%

-11.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.63%

37.60%

-11.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.26%

48.77%

-13.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.87%

45.39%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.87%

49.08%

-7.21%

Dividends

U-U.TO vs. FCX - Dividend Comparison

U-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
0.88%1.18%1.58%1.41%0.99%0.54%0.19%1.52%1.45%0.00%0.00%8.46%
U-U.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

U-U.TO vs. FCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund and Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B5.50B6.00B6.50B7.00B7.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
6.23B
(U-U.TO) Total Revenue
(FCX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. U-U.TO values in CAD, FCX values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


U-U.TO and FCX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U-U.TO and FCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer