TYLD vs. WAMA
TYLD (Cambria Tactical Yield ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. TYLD is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.
Performance
TYLD vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TYLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.32%
WAMA
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $126.17K | $129.20K | $73.80K | |
| $90.56K | $146.23K | $160.53K |
TYLD vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 1.42% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYLD and WAMA is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYLD vs. WAMA — Risk / Return Rank
TYLD
WAMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TYLD vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TYLD | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.58 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 114.54 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TYLD vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYLD drawdown since its inception was -1.06%, smaller than the maximum WAMA drawdown of -5.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLD and WAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYLD | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -5.73% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.39% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -1.50% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | — | — |
Volatility
TYLD vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYLD | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73% | 13.68% | -12.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.72% | 13.68% | -11.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.72% | 13.68% | -11.96% |
TYLD vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
TYLD vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison
TYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than WAMA's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 3.72% | 4.38% | 4.24% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TYLD and WAMA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TYLD.
TYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 0.42% for WAMA.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TYLD and 0.32% for WAMA.
Find the right allocation for TYLD and WAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer