TYL vs. SMH
TYL (Tyler Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, TYL returned 6.42%/yr vs 37.78%/yr for SMH. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TYL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYL achieves a -36.99% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 71.86% return. Over the past 10 years, TYL has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 6.42%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.78% annualized return.
TYL
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -8.69%
- YTD
- -36.99%
- 6M
- -38.00%
- 1Y
- -51.41%
- 3Y*
- -10.35%
- 5Y*
- -8.80%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
SMH
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 71.86%
- 6M
- 69.95%
- 1Y
- 128.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.01%
- 5Y*
- 38.15%
- 10Y*
- 37.78%
TYL vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | -36.99% | -21.28% | 37.91% | 29.69% | -40.07% | 23.24% | 45.50% | 61.46% | 4.95% | 24.01% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 71.86% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYL and SMH is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.38 |
The correlation between TYL and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYL vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
TYL
SMH
TYL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TYL | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.55 | -0.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 8.67 | -9.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.58 | 31.31 | -32.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TYL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYL drawdown since its inception was -93.50%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYL and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYL | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.50% | -84.96% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.00% | -14.93% | -40.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.44% | -35.74% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.44% | -45.30% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.44% | -45.30% | -12.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.77% | -7.47% | -48.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -41.00% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.60% | 4.12% | +28.48% |
Volatility
TYL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) is 12.39%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.07%. This indicates that TYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYL | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.39% | 19.07% | -6.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.96% | 29.12% | +3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.01% | 34.88% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.82% | 35.82% | -4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.07% | 32.96% | -3.89% |
Dividends
TYL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
TYL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TYL and SMH have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.07%) compared to TYL (12.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYL dropped -93.50% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TYL and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer