TYL vs. SMH
TYL (Tyler Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, TYL returned 6.68%/yr vs 35.15%/yr for SMH. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TYL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYL achieves a -30.34% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 57.98% return. Over the past 10 years, TYL has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 6.68%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 35.15% annualized return.
TYL
- 1D
- 4.19%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- 6M
- -29.12%
- YTD
- -30.34%
- 1Y
- -43.40%
- 3Y*
- -9.15%
- 5Y*
- -7.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
SMH
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- 6M
- 43.52%
- YTD
- 57.98%
- 1Y
- 97.28%
- 3Y*
- 53.38%
- 5Y*
- 36.57%
- 10Y*
- 35.15%
TYL vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | -30.34% | -21.28% | 37.91% | 29.69% | -40.07% | 23.24% | 45.50% | 61.46% | 4.95% | 24.01% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 57.98% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYL and SMH is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.38 |
The correlation between TYL and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYL vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
TYL
SMH
TYL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TYL | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.41 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 6.54 | -7.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 20.41 | -21.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TYL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYL drawdown since its inception was -93.50%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYL and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYL | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.50% | -84.96% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.00% | -14.95% | -40.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.44% | -35.74% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.44% | -45.30% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.44% | -45.30% | -12.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.10% | -14.95% | -36.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -40.93% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.78% | 4.78% | +30.00% |
Volatility
TYL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) is 12.35%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that TYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYL | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.35% | 17.01% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.32% | 31.61% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.15% | 36.97% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.13% | 36.21% | -4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.21% | 33.16% | -3.95% |
Dividends
TYL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
TYL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TYL and SMH have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to TYL (12.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYL dropped -93.50% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TYL and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer