PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYL vs. YUMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TYL vs. YUMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYL achieves a -33.08% return, which is significantly lower than YUMC's -8.96% return.


TYL

1D
-3.12%
1M
-7.17%
YTD
-33.08%
6M
-34.23%
1Y
-47.08%
3Y*
-8.59%
5Y*
-5.51%
10Y*
6.75%

YUMC

1D
-1.04%
1M
-9.65%
YTD
-8.96%
6M
-7.99%
1Y
1.21%
3Y*
-8.17%
5Y*
-7.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYL vs. YUMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TYL
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
-33.08%-21.28%37.91%29.69%-40.07%23.24%45.50%61.46%4.95%24.01%
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
-8.96%1.18%15.41%-21.60%10.75%-11.99%19.48%44.85%-15.28%53.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TYL and YUMC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016

0.25

The correlation between TYL and YUMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TYL:

$9.63

YUMC:

$2.60

PE Ratio

TYL:

31.56

YUMC:

16.49

PEG Ratio

TYL:

1.69

YUMC:

1.10

PS Ratio

TYL:

4.19

YUMC:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

TYL:

$2.38B

YUMC:

$12.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TYL:

$1.08B

YUMC:

$1.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

TYL:

$491.14M

YUMC:

$1.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TYL vs. YUMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYL
TYL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

YUMC
YUMC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
YUMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YUMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
YUMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
YUMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
YUMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYL vs. YUMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TYLYUMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.03

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

0.05

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.56

0.12

-1.68

TYL vs. YUMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYL Sharpe Ratio is -1.30, which is lower than the YUMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYL and YUMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TYLYUMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.30

0.05

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.20

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.19

-0.02

Drawdowns

TYL vs. YUMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYL drawdown since its inception was -93.50%, which is greater than YUMC's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYL and YUMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TYLYUMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.50%

-56.49%

-37.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.08%

-25.89%

-27.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.62%

-51.42%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.62%

-56.45%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.03%

-33.43%

-19.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.53%

-19.34%

-20.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.22%

9.97%

+20.25%

Volatility

TYL vs. YUMC - Volatility Comparison

Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) has a higher volatility of 12.92% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) at 5.45%. This indicates that TYL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TYLYUMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.92%

5.45%

+7.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.07%

18.91%

+13.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.33%

25.41%

+10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.67%

37.20%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.99%

35.41%

-6.42%

Dividends

TYL vs. YUMC - Dividend Comparison

TYL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TYL
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
2.47%2.01%1.33%1.23%0.88%0.96%0.42%1.00%1.25%0.25%

Financials

TYL vs. YUMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tyler Technologies, Inc. and Yum China Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
613.50M
3.27B
(TYL) Total Revenue
(YUMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TYL vs. YUMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tyler Technologies, Inc. and Yum China Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.3%
0
Portfolio components
TYL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 296.43M and revenue of 613.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

YUMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TYL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 99.81M and revenue of 613.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

YUMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 447.00M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

TYL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 81.18M and revenue of 613.50M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.

YUMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TYL and YUMC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TYL has higher volatility (12.92%) compared to YUMC (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYL dropped -93.50% vs YUMC's -56.49%.

YUMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TYL and YUMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer