TYL vs. YUMC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC).

Performance

TYL vs. YUMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TYL vs. YUMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc.	-24.58%	-21.28%	37.91%	29.69%	-40.07%	23.24%	45.50%	61.46%	4.95%	24.01%
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	2.75%	1.18%	15.41%	-21.60%	10.75%	-11.99%	19.48%	44.85%	-15.28%	53.59%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TYL : $14.91B YUMC : $17.51B
EPS TYL : $7.22 YUMC : $2.53
PE Ratio TYL : 47.44 YUMC : 19.25
PEG Ratio TYL : 2.54 YUMC : 1.28
PS Ratio TYL : 6.42 YUMC : 1.52
PB Ratio TYL : 2.64 YUMC : 3.26
Total Revenue (TTM) TYL : $2.33B YUMC : $11.80B
Gross Profit (TTM) TYL : $1.06B YUMC : $2.17B
EBITDA (TTM) TYL : $488.00M YUMC : $1.64B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYL achieves a -24.58% return, which is significantly lower than YUMC's 2.75% return.

TYL

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -3.47%
• YTD: -24.58%
• 6M: -34.56%
• 1Y: -41.11%
• 3Y*: -1.17%
• 5Y*: -4.54%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

YUMC

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -10.67%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: -4.27%
• 3Y*: -6.81%
• 5Y*: -2.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TYL vs. YUMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYL

TYL Risk / Return Rank: 6
TYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
TYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TYL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
TYL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

YUMC

YUMC Risk / Return Rank: 34
YUMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
YUMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
YUMC Omega Ratio Rank: 30
YUMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
YUMC Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYL vs. YUMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TYL	YUMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.16	-0.14	-1.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.62	0.03	-1.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.00	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	-0.18	-0.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.77	-0.29	-1.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TYL vs. YUMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYL Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the YUMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYL and YUMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TYL	YUMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.16	-0.14	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	-0.07	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.23	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between TYL and YUMC is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TYL vs. YUMC - Dividend Comparison

TYL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	2.07%	2.01%	1.33%	1.23%	0.88%	0.96%	0.42%	1.00%	1.25%	0.25%

Drawdowns

TYL vs. YUMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYL drawdown since its inception was -93.50%, which is greater than YUMC's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYL and YUMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TYL	YUMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.50%	-56.49%	-37.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.08%	-22.35%	-30.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.62%	-56.49%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.06%	-24.87%	-22.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.49%	-19.19%	-20.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.12%	13.45%	+9.67%

Volatility

TYL vs. YUMC - Volatility Comparison

Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) at 7.74%. This indicates that TYL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TYL	YUMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.92%	7.74%	+1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.58%	18.95%	+11.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.52%	31.47%	+4.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.07%	37.24%	-6.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.70%	35.62%	-6.92%

Financials

TYL vs. YUMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tyler Technologies, Inc. and Yum China Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TYL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 261.98M and revenue of 575.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.

YUMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 538.00M and revenue of 2.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

TYL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 74.98M and revenue of 575.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.

YUMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 187.00M and revenue of 2.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

TYL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 65.53M and revenue of 575.18M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

YUMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 140.00M and revenue of 2.82B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.