TYL vs. COST
TYL (Tyler Technologies, Inc.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. TYL operates in Software - Application (Technology), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, TYL returned 6.61%/yr vs 21.05%/yr for COST. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TYL vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYL achieves a -32.69% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TYL has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 6.61%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 21.05% annualized return.
TYL
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- 6M
- -15.80%
- YTD
- -32.69%
- 1Y
- -47.47%
- 3Y*
- -7.17%
- 5Y*
- -8.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
COST
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 0.75%
- 3Y*
- 21.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.27%
- 10Y*
- 21.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.88B | $2.07B | $2.36B | |
| $311.75M | $251.70M | $268.57M |
TYL vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | -32.69% | -21.28% | 37.91% | 29.69% | -40.07% | 23.24% | 45.50% | 61.46% | 4.95% | 24.01% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 11.13% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYL and COST is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 1993 | 0.24 |
The correlation between TYL and COST shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TYL:
$12.51B
COST:
$423.11B
TYL:
$7.54
COST:
$26.51
TYL:
40.55
COST:
35.99
TYL:
2.17
COST:
2.81
TYL:
5.42
COST:
1.08
TYL:
$2.43B
COST:
$293.59B
TYL:
$1.13B
COST:
$11.12B
TYL:
$469.56M
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYL vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
TYL
COST
TYL vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TYL | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.02 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 0.05 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 0.10 | -1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TYL vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYL drawdown since its inception was -93.50%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYL and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYL | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.50% | -53.39% | -40.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.00% | -16.57% | -38.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.44% | -20.74% | -36.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.44% | -31.40% | -26.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.44% | -31.40% | -26.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.76% | -12.68% | -40.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.59% | -13.36% | -26.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.40% | 7.85% | +28.55% |
Volatility
TYL vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) has a higher volatility of 15.04% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 6.76%. This indicates that TYL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYL | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.04% | 6.76% | +8.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.89% | 15.08% | +19.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.96% | 19.91% | +20.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.64% | 22.93% | +9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.49% | 22.04% | +7.45% |
Dividends
TYL vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
TYL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.58% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TYL vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tyler Technologies, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TYL vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
TYL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 307.06M and revenue of 645.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
TYL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 95.10M and revenue of 645.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
TYL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 93.51M and revenue of 645.10M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TYL and COST have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TYL has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to COST (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYL dropped -93.50% vs COST's -53.39%.
COST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TYL and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer