TYG vs. MLPFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX).
TYG is an actively managed fund by Tortoise. MLPFX is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Mar 31, 2010.
Performance
TYG vs. MLPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TYG vs. MLPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund | 16.14% | 8.46% | 60.18% | -0.37% | 24.20% | 46.86% | -70.31% | 1.79% | -24.74% | 3.17% |
MLPFX Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A | 19.58% | 8.22% | 29.99% | 22.47% | 21.84% | 39.44% | -25.43% | 6.90% | -9.63% | -4.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYG achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly lower than MLPFX's 19.58% return. Over the past 10 years, TYG has underperformed MLPFX with an annualized return of 1.56%, while MLPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.31% annualized return.
TYG
- 1D
- -7.52%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.59%
- 5Y*
- 23.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
MLPFX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 6M
- 22.32%
- 1Y
- 18.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.15%
- 5Y*
- 23.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TYG vs. MLPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYG has a 2.90% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPFX's 10.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TYG vs. MLPFX — Risk / Return Rank
TYG
MLPFX
TYG vs. MLPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TYG | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 1.16 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.51 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.31 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 3.93 | +0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TYG | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.16 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 1.35 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.45 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.37 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between TYG and MLPFX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TYG vs. MLPFX - Dividend Comparison
TYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.69%, more than MLPFX's 5.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund | 10.69% | 11.25% | 7.96% | 9.87% | 8.94% | 5.27% | 10.85% | 14.61% | 13.17% | 9.01% | 8.54% | 13.95% |
MLPFX Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A | 5.28% | 6.11% | 5.29% | 6.54% | 7.34% | 8.29% | 13.36% | 10.42% | 10.09% | 8.35% | 7.41% | 7.84% |
Drawdowns
TYG vs. MLPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYG drawdown since its inception was -95.34%, which is greater than MLPFX's maximum drawdown of -76.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYG and MLPFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYG | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.34% | -76.01% | -19.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.76% | -14.55% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.08% | -18.81% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.98% | -72.18% | -22.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.75% | -1.85% | -31.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.40% | -13.19% | -16.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 4.86% | -0.41% |
Volatility
TYG vs. MLPFX - Volatility Comparison
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX) at 3.30%. This indicates that TYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TYG | MLPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.99% | 3.30% | +7.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.97% | 8.69% | +7.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.68% | 16.90% | +6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 17.90% | +6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.27% | 25.07% | +26.20% |