TYA vs. AGGH
TYA (Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and AGGH (Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TYA is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while AGGH is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TYA returned -2.02%/yr vs 4.47%/yr for AGGH. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TYA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AGGH.
Performance
TYA vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TYA
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- 6M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- -6.92%
- 1Y
- -1.32%
- 3Y*
- -2.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGGH
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TYA vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYA Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -6.92% | 14.38% | -9.63% | -2.23% | -30.03% |
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.00% | 8.23% | 1.97% | 8.47% | -8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYA and AGGH is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.75 |
The correlation between TYA and AGGH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYA vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank
TYA
AGGH
TYA vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TYA | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.21 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.31 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 6.28 | -6.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TYA vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYA drawdown since its inception was -51.15%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYA and AGGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYA | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.15% | -13.26% | -37.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -2.83% | -8.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.94% | -6.68% | -14.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.62% | -2.05% | -40.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.94% | -4.37% | -31.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 1.04% | +3.97% |
Volatility
TYA vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) at 1.50%. This indicates that TYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYA | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 1.50% | +2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 3.49% | +5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 5.89% | +6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 8.39% | +12.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 8.39% | +12.05% |
TYA vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
TYA vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison
TYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than AGGH's 7.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 7.56% | 7.54% | 8.97% | 9.51% | 2.11% | 0.00% |
TYA Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.79% | 3.85% | 4.84% | 4.28% | 2.23% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TYA and AGGH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TYA has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to AGGH (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYA dropped -51.15% vs AGGH's -13.26%.
On 3-year performance, AGGH leads with 4.47% vs -2.02% for TYA. On fees, TYA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AGGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AGGH has performed better with a 4.47% return vs -2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TYA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AGGH.
AGGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 3.79% for TYA.
TYA is categorized as Government Bonds, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TYA and 0.33% for AGGH.
AGGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TYA and AGGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer