TYA vs. RINF
TYA (Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TYA is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while RINF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. TYA is actively managed, while RINF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TYA returned -2.02%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for RINF. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. TYA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RINF.
Performance
TYA vs. RINF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYA achieves a -6.92% return, which is significantly lower than RINF's 2.12% return.
TYA
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- 6M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- -6.92%
- 1Y
- -1.32%
- 3Y*
- -2.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RINF
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 1.88%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
TYA vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYA Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -6.92% | 14.38% | -9.63% | -2.23% | -37.62% | -0.80% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 2.12% | 1.64% | 9.79% | 0.21% | 8.77% | 4.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYA and RINF is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021 | -0.44 |
The correlation between TYA and RINF shifts across timeframes, from -0.53 (3 years) to -0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYA vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank
TYA
RINF
TYA vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TYA | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.08 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.73 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 1.33 | -1.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TYA vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYA drawdown since its inception was -51.15%, which is greater than RINF's maximum drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYA and RINF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYA | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.15% | -43.51% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -2.60% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.94% | -9.62% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.62% | -0.90% | -41.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.94% | -16.34% | -19.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 1.42% | +3.59% |
Volatility
TYA vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) at 1.26%. This indicates that TYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYA | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 1.26% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 2.93% | +6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 4.30% | +8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 12.63% | +7.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 12.55% | +7.89% |
TYA vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TYA vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison
TYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than RINF's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.67% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
TYA Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.79% | 3.85% | 4.84% | 4.28% | 2.23% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TYA and RINF have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TYA has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to RINF (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYA dropped -51.15% vs RINF's -43.51%.
On 3-year performance, RINF leads with 3.95% vs -2.02% for TYA. On fees, TYA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RINF has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RINF has performed better with a 3.95% return vs -2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TYA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
TYA has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 3.67% for RINF.
TYA is categorized as Government Bonds, while RINF is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TYA and 0.30% for RINF.
RINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TYA and RINF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer