TXS vs. SCHM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TXS (Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF) and SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - TXS tracks the Texas Capital Texas Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SCHM tracks the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TXS returned 15.28% vs 30.22% for SCHM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TXS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHM.

Performance

TXS vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXS achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHM's 19.35% return.

TXS

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 11.72%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 15.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHM

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 19.35%
• 6M: 16.97%
• 1Y: 30.22%
• 3Y*: 17.93%
• 5Y*: 7.93%
• 10Y*: 11.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXS vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TXS Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF	11.72%	10.31%	24.29%	5.77%
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF	19.35%	10.17%	11.98%	4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TXS and SCHM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.87

The correlation between TXS and SCHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

TXS vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TXS	SCHM
Energy	19.1%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	17.0%	10.8%
Technology	15.1%	22.1%
Industrials	14.6%	21.7%
Real Estate	12.1%	6.4%
Healthcare	9.0%	10.9%
Financial Services	7.0%	10.9%
Communication Services	2.4%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	3.4%
Utilities	1.7%	2.9%
Basic Materials	0.3%	4.7%

Return for Risk

TXS vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXS

TXS Risk / Return Rank: 45
TXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
TXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
TXS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
TXS Martin Ratio Rank: 52

SCHM

SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 67
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXS vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TXS	SCHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.87	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.64	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	3.26	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.92	13.00	-5.08

TXS vs. SCHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the SCHM Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXS and SCHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TXS vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXS drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, smaller than the maximum SCHM drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXS and SCHM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TXS	SCHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.69%	-42.43%	+22.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.54%	-9.32%	+2.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.27%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-1.54%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-5.64%	+2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	2.33%	-0.40%

Volatility

TXS vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) is 3.14%, while Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that TXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TXS	SCHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	5.74%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.18%	12.58%	-4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.71%	16.29%	-4.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	19.66%	-3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.83%	20.48%	-4.65%

TXS vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TXS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

TXS vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

TXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than SCHM's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF	1.22%	1.46%	1.43%	1.50%	1.67%	1.13%	1.31%	1.48%	1.56%	1.27%	1.51%	1.54%
TXS Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF	0.75%	0.82%	0.86%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TXS and SCHM in my portfolio?

TXS and SCHM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TXS or SCHM?

SCHM has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to TXS (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXS dropped -19.69% vs SCHM's -42.43%.

Which ETF is better, TXS or SCHM?

On 1-year performance, SCHM leads with 30.22% vs 15.28% for TXS. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TXS or SCHM?

Over the 1-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 30.22% return vs 15.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TXS or SCHM?

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for TXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TXS or SCHM?

SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.75% for TXS.

What is the main difference between TXS and SCHM?

TXS tracks Texas Capital Texas Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TXS and 0.04% for SCHM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.