TXN vs. FLCH
TXN (Texas Instruments Incorporated) is a stock, while FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, TXN returned 12.46%/yr vs -5.25%/yr for FLCH. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TXN vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TXN achieves a 69.63% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -9.50% return.
TXN
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 69.63%
- 6M
- 62.64%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 23.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- 19.97%
FLCH
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- 1Y
- 2.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -5.25%
- 10Y*
- —
TXN vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 69.63% | -4.47% | 13.14% | 6.41% | -9.86% | 17.53% | 31.70% | 39.56% | -7.17% | 5.99% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -9.50% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TXN and FLCH is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.43 |
The correlation between TXN and FLCH shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (5 years) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TXN vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
TXN
FLCH
TXN vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TXN | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.04 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 0.13 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 0.29 | +3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TXN | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.11 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | -0.18 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.00 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
TXN vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TXN drawdown since its inception was -85.81%, which is greater than FLCH's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXN and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TXN | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.81% | -62.09% | -23.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.57% | -17.14% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.41% | -25.43% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.41% | -55.78% | +22.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.46% | -36.20% | +25.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -30.54% | -4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.11% | 7.58% | +6.53% |
Volatility
TXN vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) has a higher volatility of 13.93% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.46%. This indicates that TXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TXN | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.93% | 6.46% | +7.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.98% | 13.88% | +17.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.96% | 19.31% | +20.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 29.61% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.13% | 27.91% | +3.22% |
Dividends
TXN vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
TXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than FLCH's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.61% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1.93% | 3.17% | 2.81% | 2.94% | 2.84% | 2.23% | 2.27% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.03% | 2.25% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TXN and FLCH have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TXN has higher volatility (13.93%) compared to FLCH (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXN dropped -85.81% vs FLCH's -62.09%.
TXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TXN and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer