TWSAX vs. GRSPX
TWSAX (American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund) and GRSPX (Greenspring Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, TWSAX returned 10.20%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for GRSPX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TWSAX charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for GRSPX.
Performance
TWSAX vs. GRSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWSAX achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than GRSPX's 20.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TWSAX having a 10.20% annualized return and GRSPX not far behind at 9.86%.
TWSAX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
GRSPX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 41.15%
- 6M
- 17.39%
- YTD
- 20.03%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
TWSAX vs. GRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWSAX American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund | 7.98% | 15.87% | 13.12% | 15.28% | -15.47% | 14.92% | 18.37% | 24.38% | -6.59% | 19.22% |
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 20.03% | 6.12% | 15.53% | 11.95% | -8.62% | 26.89% | 3.81% | 20.84% | -10.21% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWSAX and GRSPX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 1996 | 0.80 |
The correlation between TWSAX and GRSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWSAX vs. GRSPX — Risk / Return Rank
TWSAX
GRSPX
TWSAX vs. GRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund (TWSAX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TWSAX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 0.75 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.64 | 7.05 | +0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TWSAX vs. GRSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWSAX drawdown since its inception was -46.25%, which is greater than GRSPX's maximum drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWSAX and GRSPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWSAX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.25% | -35.67% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.27% | -30.41% | +22.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.75% | -30.41% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.64% | -30.41% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.07% | -35.07% | +5.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -2.85% | +2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -4.81% | -2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.10% | -1.13% |
Volatility
TWSAX vs. GRSPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund (TWSAX) is 3.59%, while Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a volatility of 50.75%. This indicates that TWSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWSAX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 50.75% | -47.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.97% | 51.02% | -42.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.83% | 56.39% | -45.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.53% | 28.19% | -14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 22.51% | -8.50% |
TWSAX vs. GRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWSAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than GRSPX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
TWSAX vs. GRSPX - Dividend Comparison
TWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, less than GRSPX's 7.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 7.83% | 9.40% | 6.70% | 6.84% | 8.04% | 7.69% | 2.39% | 7.89% | 11.05% | 9.63% | 6.81% | 5.34% |
TWSAX American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund | 6.47% | 6.98% | 6.92% | 2.38% | 5.51% | 13.14% | 6.54% | 15.43% | 14.22% | 9.74% | 1.54% | 7.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TWSAX and GRSPX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRSPX has higher volatility (50.75%) compared to TWSAX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWSAX dropped -46.25% vs GRSPX's -35.67%.
TWSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TWSAX and GRSPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer