PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWSAX vs. ACFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWSAX vs. ACFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund (TWSAX) and American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWSAX achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than ACFOX's 10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, TWSAX has underperformed ACFOX with an annualized return of 10.29%, while ACFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.70% annualized return.


TWSAX

1D
0.11%
1M
3.14%
YTD
7.98%
6M
9.16%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
10.29%

ACFOX

1D
0.50%
1M
7.30%
YTD
10.45%
6M
12.85%
1Y
35.16%
3Y*
28.74%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
19.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWSAX vs. ACFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWSAX
American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund
7.98%15.87%13.12%15.28%-15.47%14.92%18.37%24.38%-6.59%19.22%
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
10.45%20.51%43.30%35.66%-36.32%7.08%73.31%32.30%6.51%34.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TWSAX and ACFOX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2006

0.87

The correlation between TWSAX and ACFOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWSAX vs. ACFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWSAX
TWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ACFOX
ACFOX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ACFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ACFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWSAX vs. ACFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund (TWSAX) and American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWSAXACFOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.95

1.94

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.78

2.58

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.12

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.36

7.50

+2.86

TWSAX vs. ACFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the ACFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWSAX and ACFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWSAXACFOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.94

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.47

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.83

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.58

-0.01

Drawdowns

TWSAX vs. ACFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWSAX drawdown since its inception was -46.25%, smaller than the maximum ACFOX drawdown of -58.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWSAX and ACFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWSAXACFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.25%

-58.92%

+12.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.27%

-16.52%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-27.03%

+12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.64%

-43.77%

+20.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.07%

-43.77%

+13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-14.71%

+6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

4.67%

-2.73%

Volatility

TWSAX vs. ACFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund (TWSAX) is 2.97%, while American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that TWSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWSAXACFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

4.97%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.23%

14.51%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

18.79%

-8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.44%

25.27%

-11.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

23.81%

-9.73%

TWSAX vs. ACFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWSAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than ACFOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWSAX vs. ACFOX - Dividend Comparison

TWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, less than ACFOX's 6.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
6.84%7.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.48%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.15%1.33%
TWSAX
American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund
6.47%6.98%6.92%2.38%5.51%13.14%6.54%15.43%14.22%9.74%1.54%7.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWSAX and ACFOX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACFOX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to TWSAX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWSAX dropped -46.25% vs ACFOX's -58.92%.

TWSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWSAX and ACFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer