TWSAX vs. PRPFX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund (TWSAX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX).
TWSAX is managed by American Century. It was launched on Feb 14, 1996. PRPFX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Nov 30, 1982.
Performance
TWSAX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TWSAX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWSAX American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund | -3.64% | 15.87% | 13.12% | 15.28% | -15.47% | 14.92% | 18.37% | 24.38% | -6.59% | 19.22% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 2.72% | 28.78% | 19.36% | 11.96% | -5.48% | 10.87% | 18.80% | 19.20% | -7.02% | 11.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWSAX achieves a -3.64% return, which is significantly lower than PRPFX's 2.72% return. Over the past 10 years, TWSAX has underperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.84% annualized return.
TWSAX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -3.64%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
PRPFX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TWSAX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWSAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TWSAX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank
TWSAX
PRPFX
TWSAX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund (TWSAX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TWSAX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.86 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 2.31 | -0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.40 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.07 | -1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 11.17 | -6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TWSAX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.86 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 1.11 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 1.03 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.80 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between TWSAX and PRPFX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TWSAX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison
TWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than PRPFX's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWSAX American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund | 7.25% | 6.98% | 6.92% | 2.38% | 5.51% | 13.14% | 6.54% | 15.43% | 14.22% | 9.74% | 1.54% | 7.60% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 3.18% | 3.27% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 2.05% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 0.95% | 7.06% |
Drawdowns
TWSAX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWSAX drawdown since its inception was -46.25%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWSAX and PRPFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWSAX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.25% | -27.16% | -19.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.77% | -8.10% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.64% | -15.49% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.07% | -20.84% | -9.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.27% | -8.10% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -3.52% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.22% | -0.03% |
Volatility
TWSAX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison
American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund (TWSAX) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) at 3.59%. This indicates that TWSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TWSAX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 3.59% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.64% | 11.32% | -3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.46% | 13.77% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 11.04% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 10.57% | +3.46% |