ACFOX vs. PRGFX

In the year-to-date period, ACFOX achieves a -21.99% return, which is significantly lower than PRGFX's -18.10% return. Over the past 10 years, ACFOX has outperformed PRGFX with an annualized return of 12.48%, while PRGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.50% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ACFOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PRGFX's 0.63% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ACFOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the PRGFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACFOX and PRGFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ACFOX nor PRGFX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ACFOX drawdown since its inception was -59.40%, roughly equal to the maximum PRGFX drawdown of -57.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFOX and PRGFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) is NaN%, while T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that ACFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.