PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWIN vs. RAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TWIN vs. RAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) and FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWIN achieves a 33.45% return, which is significantly higher than RAIL's -16.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TWIN has outperformed RAIL with an annualized return of 8.84%, while RAIL has yielded a comparatively lower -3.62% annualized return.


TWIN

1D
-0.54%
1M
38.59%
YTD
33.45%
6M
32.11%
1Y
161.36%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
8.84%

RAIL

1D
0.65%
1M
17.66%
YTD
-16.35%
6M
-14.65%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
50.80%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
-3.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWIN vs. RAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated
33.45%44.37%-26.42%66.71%-11.31%39.62%-28.77%-25.29%-44.49%81.99%
RAIL
FreightCar America, Inc.
-16.35%23.55%231.85%-15.63%-13.28%53.11%16.43%-69.06%-60.83%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TWIN and RAIL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2005

0.28

The correlation between TWIN and RAIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (5 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TWIN:

$319.46M

RAIL:

$328.95M

EPS

TWIN:

$1.88

RAIL:

$0.88

PE Ratio

TWIN:

11.82

RAIL:

10.48

PS Ratio

TWIN:

0.86

RAIL:

0.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

TWIN:

$363.55M

RAIL:

$469.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TWIN:

$102.45M

RAIL:

$69.61M

EBITDA (TTM)

TWIN:

$22.57M

RAIL:

-$1.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Twin Disc, Incorporated

FreightCar America, Inc.

Return for Risk

TWIN vs. RAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWIN
TWIN Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TWIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWIN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TWIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWIN Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

RAIL
RAIL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWIN vs. RAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) and FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWINRAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.08

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.00

0.18

+6.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.80

0.31

+17.48

TWIN vs. RAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the RAIL Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWIN and RAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWIN vs. RAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWIN drawdown since its inception was -89.97%, smaller than the maximum RAIL drawdown of -98.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWIN and RAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWINRAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.97%

-98.88%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.20%

-50.34%

+27.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.40%

-71.67%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.53%

-71.67%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.84%

-96.23%

+11.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.89%

-86.39%

+41.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.05%

-71.88%

+28.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.11%

29.07%

-19.96%

Volatility

TWIN vs. RAIL - Volatility Comparison

Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) has a higher volatility of 15.77% compared to FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) at 14.60%. This indicates that TWIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWINRAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.77%

14.60%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.89%

47.10%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.92%

62.82%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.27%

69.21%

-14.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.82%

73.78%

-15.96%

Dividends

TWIN vs. RAIL - Dividend Comparison

TWIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while RAIL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RAIL
FreightCar America, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.58%2.41%1.85%
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated
0.72%0.96%1.36%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.42%

Financials

TWIN vs. RAIL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Twin Disc, Incorporated and FreightCar America, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00M20222023202420252026
96.69M
64.31M
(TWIN) Total Revenue
(RAIL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TWIN vs. RAIL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Twin Disc, Incorporated and FreightCar America, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
28.1%
16.8%
Portfolio components
TWIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twin Disc, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 27.13M and revenue of 96.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.1%.

RAIL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FreightCar America, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.81M and revenue of 64.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.8%.

TWIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twin Disc, Incorporated reported an operating income of 5.82M and revenue of 96.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

RAIL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FreightCar America, Inc. reported an operating income of -594.00K and revenue of 64.31M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.9%.

TWIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twin Disc, Incorporated reported a net income of 3.33M and revenue of 96.69M, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

RAIL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FreightCar America, Inc. reported a net income of 41.65M and revenue of 64.31M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TWIN and RAIL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWIN has higher volatility (15.77%) compared to RAIL (14.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWIN dropped -89.97% vs RAIL's -98.88%.

TWIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWIN and RAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer