PortfoliosLab logo
TWIN vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TWIN and QQQ is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

TWIN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TWIN:

-0.91

QQQ:

0.62

Sortino Ratio

TWIN:

-1.33

QQQ:

0.92

Omega Ratio

TWIN:

0.85

QQQ:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

TWIN:

-0.56

QQQ:

0.60

Martin Ratio

TWIN:

-1.55

QQQ:

1.94

Ulcer Index

TWIN:

30.40%

QQQ:

7.02%

Daily Std Dev

TWIN:

52.62%

QQQ:

25.59%

Max Drawdown

TWIN:

-89.97%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

TWIN:

-82.18%

QQQ:

-3.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWIN achieves a -37.71% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TWIN has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -8.71%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.


TWIN

YTD

-37.71%

1M

-0.69%

6M

-41.49%

1Y

-47.83%

3Y*

-9.44%

5Y*

6.23%

10Y*

-8.71%

QQQ

YTD

1.69%

1M

9.18%

6M

2.15%

1Y

15.66%

3Y*

19.78%

5Y*

18.08%

10Y*

17.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Twin Disc, Incorporated

Invesco QQQ

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TWIN vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWIN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TWIN is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TWIN is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TWIN is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TWIN is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TWIN is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TWIN is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TWIN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TWIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWIN and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TWIN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

TWIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than QQQ's 0.58% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated
2.21%1.36%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.42%1.81%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.58%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

TWIN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWIN drawdown since its inception was -89.97%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWIN and QQQ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TWIN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) has a higher volatility of 15.84% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.62%. This indicates that TWIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...