TUR vs. NLR
TUR (iShares MSCI Turkey ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUR is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index, while NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TUR returned 3.98%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for NLR. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
TUR vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUR achieves a 15.93% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -15.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TUR has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 3.98%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.66% annualized return.
TUR
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 22.19%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 3.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.26%
NLR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -17.23%
- 6M
- -29.26%
- YTD
- -15.40%
- 1Y
- -8.06%
- 3Y*
- 23.46%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.20%
TUR vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUR iShares MSCI Turkey ETF | 15.93% | -1.54% | 12.91% | -8.83% | 105.75% | -27.41% | -1.19% | 14.49% | -41.46% | 37.58% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -15.40% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUR and NLR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008 | 0.36 |
The correlation between TUR and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TUR vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TUR
NLR
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
Industrials
TUR
NLR
Financial Services
TUR
NLR
-
Consumer Defensive
TUR
NLR
-
Basic Materials
TUR
NLR
Energy
TUR
NLR
Consumer Cyclical
TUR
NLR
-
Communication Services
TUR
NLR
-
Healthcare
TUR
NLR
-
Utilities
TUR
NLR
Real Estate
TUR
NLR
-
Technology
TUR
NLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUR vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
TUR
NLR
TUR vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TUR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.00 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | -0.22 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | -0.50 | +4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TUR vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUR drawdown since its inception was -72.34%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUR and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.34% | -65.05% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -36.61% | +20.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.63% | -36.61% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.63% | -36.61% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.25% | -36.61% | -22.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.04% | -36.08% | +9.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.81% | -35.67% | -4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.27% | 16.20% | -9.93% |
Volatility
TUR vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) is 5.19%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 9.51%. This indicates that TUR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 9.51% | -4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.41% | 32.62% | -12.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.64% | 43.18% | -18.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.16% | 29.88% | +4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.13% | 24.43% | +9.70% |
TUR vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUR vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
TUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than NLR's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 3.01% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
TUR iShares MSCI Turkey ETF | 2.13% | 2.40% | 1.79% | 4.43% | 1.97% | 4.22% | 0.87% | 3.29% | 4.05% | 2.64% | 2.89% | 3.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUR and NLR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to TUR (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUR dropped -72.34% vs NLR's -65.05%.
On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 10.66% vs 3.98% for TUR. On fees, NLR is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, TUR has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 10.66% return vs 3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NLR is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TUR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.13% for TUR.
TUR is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NLR is Uranium. TUR tracks MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TUR and 0.56% for NLR.
TUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUR and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer