TUGN vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TUGN (STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUGN is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by STF, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. TUGN is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUGN returned 22.62%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for OILK. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. TUGN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

TUGN vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.09% return.

TUGN

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 9.47%
• YTD: 18.98%
• 6M: 18.02%
• 1Y: 36.01%
• 3Y*: 22.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 61.09%
• 6M: 56.40%
• 1Y: 56.95%
• 3Y*: 18.39%
• 5Y*: 17.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUGN vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	18.98%	19.11%	18.44%	34.84%	-18.78%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	61.09%	-11.86%	8.18%	-0.97%	-12.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TUGN and OILK is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022	-0.00

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TUGN and OILK has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.00 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

TUGN vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TUGN	OILK
Technology	53.8%	-
Communication Services	15.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	-
Healthcare	4.3%	-
Industrials	3.2%	-
Utilities	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	-
Energy	0.7%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

TUGN vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUGN

TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 66
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 56

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUGN vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TUGN	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	1.99	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.51	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.33	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	3.30	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.73	6.67	+3.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TUGN vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUGN Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUGN and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TUGN	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	1.99	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.11	+0.85

Drawdowns

TUGN vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUGN	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.45%	-83.76%	+60.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.96%	-17.35%	+4.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.60%	-23.42%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-5.49%	+4.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-32.60%	+26.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	8.57%	-4.86%

Volatility

TUGN vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) is 5.28%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that TUGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUGN	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.28%	10.52%	-5.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	23.32%	-11.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.24%	28.82%	-13.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.03%	30.13%	-13.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	35.97%	-18.94%

TUGN vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUGN vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than OILK's 8.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.34%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	10.53%	11.50%	11.84%	10.83%	7.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUGN and OILK in my portfolio?

TUGN and OILK have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TUGN or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to TUGN (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUGN dropped -23.45% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, TUGN or OILK?

On 3-year performance, TUGN leads with 22.62% vs 18.39% for OILK. On fees, TUGN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TUGN has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUGN or OILK?

Over the 3-year period, TUGN has performed better with a 22.62% return vs 18.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUGN or OILK?

TUGN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUGN or OILK?

TUGN has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 8.34% for OILK.

What is the main difference between TUGN and OILK?

TUGN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: STF and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUGN and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TUGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.