PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUGN vs. MKAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TUGN vs. MKAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and MKAM ETF (MKAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TUGN vs. MKAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
-6.61%19.11%18.44%23.49%
MKAM
MKAM ETF
-1.48%8.07%12.15%8.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a -6.61% return, which is significantly lower than MKAM's -1.48% return.


TUGN

1D
3.10%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
-6.61%
6M
-6.35%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
10Y*

MKAM

1D
0.94%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
0.34%
1Y
7.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TUGN vs. MKAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MKAM's 0.96% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TUGN vs. MKAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUGN
TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

MKAM
MKAM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUGN vs. MKAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and MKAM ETF (MKAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUGNMKAMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.23

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

1.71

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.02

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.16

7.08

-1.92

TUGN vs. MKAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUGN Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the MKAM Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUGN and MKAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUGNMKAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.23

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.45

-0.86

Correlation

The correlation between TUGN and MKAM is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TUGN vs. MKAM - Dividend Comparison

TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, more than MKAM's 3.10% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
12.75%11.50%11.84%10.83%7.58%
MKAM
MKAM ETF
3.10%2.56%1.88%1.70%0.00%

Drawdowns

TUGN vs. MKAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than MKAM's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and MKAM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGNMKAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-5.01%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.96%

-3.72%

-9.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.26%

-2.82%

-7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-1.17%

-5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

1.06%

+2.81%

Volatility

TUGN vs. MKAM - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to MKAM ETF (MKAM) at 1.96%. This indicates that TUGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TUGNMKAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

1.96%

+3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

5.05%

+6.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.54%

6.06%

+15.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

6.28%

+10.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

6.28%

+10.73%