TUGN vs. MDAA

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TUGN (STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TUGN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.

Performance

TUGN vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TUGN having a 18.08% return and MDAA slightly higher at 18.45%.

TUGN

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: 18.46%
• YTD: 18.08%
• 1Y: 26.98%
• 3Y*: 21.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.35%

MDAA

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: 2.39%
• 6M: 9.08%
• YTD: 18.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	$2.21K	$4.58K	$40.10K
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	$654.11K	$710.47K	$821.00K

TUGN vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	18.08%	-0.31%
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	18.45%	-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TUGN and MDAA is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

TUGN vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TUGN

TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 53
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 53
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 51

MDAA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TUGN vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TUGN	MDAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.68	—	—

Drawdowns

TUGN vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and MDAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUGN	MDAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.45%	-14.59%	-8.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-4.09%	+2.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.31%	-3.53%	-2.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TUGN	MDAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.98%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.95%	24.57%	-6.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.46%	24.57%	-7.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	24.57%	-7.11%

TUGN vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUGN vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison

TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%, more than MDAA's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	0.39%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	11.05%	11.50%	11.84%	10.83%	7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUGN and MDAA in my portfolio?

TUGN and MDAA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TUGN or MDAA?

On fees, TUGN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUGN or MDAA?

TUGN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUGN or MDAA?

TUGN has the higher dividend yield at 11.05%, compared with 0.39% for MDAA.

What is the main difference between TUGN and MDAA?

They also come from different issuers: Shelton and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUGN and 0.97% for MDAA.