TUG vs. RAAX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TUG (STF Tactical Growth ETF) and RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUG returned 21.48%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for RAAX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RAAX.

Performance

TUG vs. RAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUG achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than RAAX's 11.48% return.

TUG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 15.37%
• 6M: 13.66%
• 1Y: 31.40%
• 3Y*: 21.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RAAX

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: -6.51%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 6M: 9.39%
• 1Y: 27.20%
• 3Y*: 19.77%
• 5Y*: 12.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUG vs. RAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	15.37%	20.43%	19.37%	38.24%	-12.62%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	11.48%	26.74%	12.50%	6.71%	-4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TUG and RAAX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022	0.31

Return for Risk

TUG vs. RAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUG

TUG Risk / Return Rank: 58
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

RAAX

RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUG vs. RAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TUG	RAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.89	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.51	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.34	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	3.10	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.38	12.20	-2.82

TUG vs. RAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the RAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUG and RAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TUG vs. RAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUG drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, smaller than the maximum RAAX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUG and RAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUG	RAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.27%	-33.91%	+11.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	-8.81%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.27%	-11.59%	-10.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.60%	-8.81%	+4.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.30%	-6.77%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	2.24%	+1.12%

Volatility

TUG vs. RAAX - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) at 5.13%. This indicates that TUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUG	RAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.62%	5.13%	+3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.26%	12.53%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.83%	14.46%	+3.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	15.69%	+2.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.32%	15.80%	+2.52%

TUG vs. RAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUG vs. RAAX - Dividend Comparison

TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than RAAX's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	2.10%	2.34%	1.91%	3.66%	1.53%	8.72%	6.27%	2.37%	0.56%
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	1.49%	1.75%	4.97%	1.34%	1.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUG and RAAX in my portfolio?

TUG and RAAX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TUG or RAAX?

TUG has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to RAAX (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUG dropped -22.27% vs RAAX's -33.91%.

Which ETF is better, TUG or RAAX?

On 3-year performance, TUG leads with 21.48% vs 19.77% for RAAX. On fees, TUG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RAAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUG or RAAX?

Over the 3-year period, TUG has performed better with a 21.48% return vs 19.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUG or RAAX?

TUG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUG or RAAX?

RAAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.49% for TUG.

What is the main difference between TUG and RAAX?

They also come from different issuers: STF and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUG and 0.78% for RAAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.