TUG vs. DRAI
TUG (STF Tactical Growth ETF) and DRAI (Draco Evolution AI ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TUG returned 40.10% vs 41.96% for DRAI. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TUG charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DRAI.
Performance
TUG vs. DRAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUG achieves a 20.36% return, which is significantly higher than DRAI's 18.51% return.
TUG
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 11.01%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 40.10%
- 3Y*
- 23.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAI
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 41.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUG vs. DRAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF | 20.36% | 20.43% | -2.81% |
DRAI Draco Evolution AI ETF | 18.51% | 33.68% | -7.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUG and DRAI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between TUG and DRAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
TUG vs. DRAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TUG
DRAI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
TUG
DRAI
Communication Services
TUG
DRAI
Consumer Cyclical
TUG
DRAI
Consumer Defensive
TUG
DRAI
Healthcare
TUG
DRAI
Industrials
TUG
DRAI
Utilities
TUG
DRAI
Basic Materials
TUG
DRAI
Energy
TUG
DRAI
Financial Services
TUG
DRAI
Real Estate
TUG
DRAI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUG vs. DRAI — Risk / Return Rank
TUG
DRAI
TUG vs. DRAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Draco Evolution AI ETF (DRAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUG | DRAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.55 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 5.84 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.47 | 16.23 | -3.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUG | DRAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.95 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 1.33 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
TUG vs. DRAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUG drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, which is greater than DRAI's maximum drawdown of -13.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUG and DRAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUG | DRAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.27% | -13.69% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -7.22% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.50% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -4.08% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 2.59% | +0.63% |
Volatility
TUG vs. DRAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) is 4.30%, while Draco Evolution AI ETF (DRAI) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that TUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUG | DRAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 5.23% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 9.87% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.16% | 14.37% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 16.75% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 16.75% | +1.27% |
TUG vs. DRAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAI's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUG vs. DRAI - Dividend Comparison
TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than DRAI's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAI Draco Evolution AI ETF | 1.30% | 1.48% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF | 1.43% | 1.75% | 4.97% | 1.34% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUG and DRAI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRAI has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to TUG (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUG dropped -22.27% vs DRAI's -13.69%.
On 1-year performance, DRAI leads with 41.96% vs 40.10% for TUG. On fees, TUG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TUG has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DRAI has performed better with a 41.96% return vs 40.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TUG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DRAI.
TUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.30% for DRAI.
They also come from different issuers: STF and Draco Evolution. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUG and 1.50% for DRAI.
DRAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUG and DRAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer