TUG vs. DDX
TUG (STF Tactical Growth ETF) and DDX (Defined Duration 10 ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUG returned 23.61%/yr vs 8.16%/yr for DDX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TUG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDX.
Performance
TUG vs. DDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUG achieves a 20.36% return, which is significantly higher than DDX's 4.86% return.
TUG
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 11.01%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 40.10%
- 3Y*
- 23.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUG vs. DDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF | 20.36% | 20.43% | 19.37% | 38.24% | -12.62% |
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 4.86% | 12.02% | 2.93% | 10.48% | -3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUG and DDX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022 | 0.52 |
The correlation between TUG and DDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
TUG vs. DDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TUG
DDX
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
TUG
DDX
Communication Services
TUG
DDX
Consumer Cyclical
TUG
DDX
Consumer Defensive
TUG
DDX
Healthcare
TUG
DDX
Industrials
TUG
DDX
Utilities
TUG
DDX
Basic Materials
TUG
DDX
Energy
TUG
DDX
Financial Services
TUG
DDX
Real Estate
TUG
DDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUG vs. DDX — Risk / Return Rank
TUG
DDX
TUG vs. DDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUG | DDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.91 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.47 | 11.71 | +0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUG | DDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.35 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.37 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
TUG vs. DDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUG drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, roughly equal to the maximum DDX drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUG and DDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUG | DDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.27% | -21.27% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -4.41% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.27% | -6.17% | -16.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.24% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -7.12% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 1.09% | +2.13% |
Volatility
TUG vs. DDX - Volatility Comparison
STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) at 2.03%. This indicates that TUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUG | DDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 2.03% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 4.46% | +7.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.16% | 5.47% | +10.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 7.48% | +10.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 7.48% | +10.54% |
TUG vs. DDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUG vs. DDX - Dividend Comparison
TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than DDX's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 3.39% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.41% | 1.38% | 1.14% |
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF | 1.43% | 1.75% | 4.97% | 1.34% | 1.14% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUG and DDX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUG has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to DDX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUG dropped -22.27% vs DDX's -21.27%.
On 3-year performance, TUG leads with 23.61% vs 8.16% for DDX. On fees, DDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TUG has performed better with a 23.61% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TUG.
DDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.43% for TUG.
They also come from different issuers: STF and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUG and 0.25% for DDX.
TUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUG and DDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer