PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUG vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUG vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUG achieves a 20.36% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.


TUG

1D
-0.48%
1M
11.01%
YTD
20.36%
6M
19.04%
1Y
40.10%
3Y*
23.61%
5Y*
10Y*

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUG vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TUG
STF Tactical Growth ETF
20.36%20.43%19.37%38.24%-12.62%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%-16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TUG and DBO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022

0.01

The correlation between TUG and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TUG vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUG
DBO

Technology

54.6%

-

Communication Services

15.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.4%

-

Healthcare

4.1%

-

Industrials

3.0%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.7%

-

Financial Services

0.3%
116.0%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TUG
54.6%
DBO

-

Communication Services

TUG
15.4%
DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

TUG
12.0%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

TUG
7.4%
DBO

-

Healthcare

TUG
4.1%
DBO

-

Industrials

TUG
3.0%
DBO

-

Utilities

TUG
1.4%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

TUG
1.1%
DBO

-

Energy

TUG
0.7%
DBO

-

Financial Services

TUG
0.3%
DBO
116.0%

Real Estate

TUG
0.1%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUG vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUG
TUG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUG vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUGDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.38

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

4.44

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.47

9.02

+3.45

TUG vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUG and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUGDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.34

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.02

+1.10

Drawdowns

TUG vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUG drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUG and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.27%

-90.18%

+67.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-18.19%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.27%

-28.20%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-51.38%

+50.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-62.25%

+57.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

8.92%

-5.70%

Volatility

TUG vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) is 4.30%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that TUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUGDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

12.61%

-8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

28.20%

-15.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.16%

34.46%

-18.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.02%

32.29%

-14.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

31.78%

-13.76%

TUG vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUG vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
TUG
STF Tactical Growth ETF
1.43%1.75%4.97%1.34%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUG and DBO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to TUG (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUG dropped -22.27% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 3-year performance, TUG leads with 23.61% vs 21.86% for DBO. On fees, TUG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TUG has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TUG has performed better with a 23.61% return vs 21.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TUG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.43% for TUG.

TUG is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: STF and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUG and 0.78% for DBO.

TUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUG and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer